Proof related to angular momentum

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving that if the total linear momentum of a system of particles is zero, the angular momentum remains constant regardless of the chosen origin. The proof involves defining angular momentum as vec{L} = sum_i vec{r_i} times vec{p_i} and demonstrating that shifting the origin does not affect the total angular momentum when linear momentum is zero. The final expression confirms that sum_i vec{R} times vec{p_i} = vec{R} times sum_i vec{p_i} results in zero, thus validating the claim.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of angular momentum as vec{L} = vec{r} times vec{p}
  • Familiarity with vector operations, particularly the cross product
  • Knowledge of linear momentum and its implications in physics
  • Basic grasp of particle systems and their dynamics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of angular momentum in different coordinate systems
  • Learn about the implications of conservation laws in mechanics
  • Explore the relationship between linear and angular momentum in complex systems
  • Investigate the role of reference frames in classical mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, particularly those studying mechanics, as well as educators and anyone interested in the foundational principles of angular momentum and its proofs.

Saitama
Messages
4,244
Reaction score
93

Homework Statement


Show that if the total linear momentum of system of particles is zero, the angular momentum of the system is same about all origins.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I really don't know where to begin with this. I am not good at these kind of proofs. I need a few hints on how to approach such problems.

Any help is appreciated. Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You want to prove a general result. So, start with the most general definition of the total angular momentum of a system of particles. See what happens to this expression if you shift the origin.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Start by writing up what you know, namely the expression for the total linear momentum (which you know is zero) and the total angular momentum for some arbitrary points a and b. You then may want to look at how each relative vector from point b to a particle relates to the relative vector from point a to same particle?
 
TSny said:
You want to prove a general result. So, start with the most general definition of the total angular momentum of a system of particles. See what happens to this expression if you shift the origin.

Angular momentum for a particle is defined as
$$\vec{L}=\vec{r}\times \vec{p}$$
where ##\vec{r}## is the radius vector of the particle from some fixed point (origin) and ##\vec{p}## is the momentum of particle.

For a system of particle,
$$\vec{L}=\sum_i \vec{r_i} \times \vec{p_i}$$
where i denotes the ith particle.

Shifting the origin, the new position vector for the ith particle is
$$\vec{r_i'}=\vec{r_i}-\vec{R}$$
Hence,
$$\vec{L'}=\sum_i \vec{r_i'}\times \vec{p_i}=\sum_i(\vec{r_i}-\vec{R})\times p_i$$
$$\Rightarrow \vec{L'}=\vec{L}-\sum_i \vec{R}\times \vec{p_i}$$
The second term is zero, hence proved.

Is this the correct way? Did I use the right words?

Thank you TSny! :)
 
Pranav-Arora said:
Angular momentum for a particle is defined as
$$\vec{L}=\vec{r}\times \vec{p}$$
where ##\vec{r}## is the radius vector of the particle from some fixed point (origin) and ##\vec{p}## is the momentum of particle.

For a system of particle,
$$\vec{L}=\sum_i \vec{r_i} \times \vec{p_i}$$
where i denotes the ith particle.

Shifting the origin, the new position vector for the ith particle is
$$\vec{r_i'}=\vec{r_i}-\vec{R}$$
Hence,
$$\vec{L'}=\sum_i \vec{r_i'}\times \vec{p_i}=\sum_i(\vec{r_i}-\vec{R})\times p_i$$
$$\Rightarrow \vec{L'}=\vec{L}-\sum_i \vec{R}\times \vec{p_i}$$
The second term is zero, hence proved.

Is this the correct way? Did I use the right words?

Thank you TSny! :)

Looks right to me. The final result is more obvious if you write out explicitly that $$\sum_i \vec{R}\times \vec{p_i} = \vec{R}\times \sum_i \vec{p_i}$$
 
TSny said:
Looks right to me. The final result is more obvious if you write out explicitly that $$\sum_i \vec{R}\times \vec{p_i} = \vec{R}\times \sum_i \vec{p_i}$$

Got it, thanks a lot TSny! :smile:
 

Similar threads

Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
1K
Replies
67
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K