Proof related to angular momentum

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving a relationship between the total linear momentum and angular momentum of a system of particles, specifically that if the total linear momentum is zero, the angular momentum remains the same regardless of the chosen origin.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the general definition of total angular momentum and how it changes when the origin is shifted. There are attempts to relate the expressions for angular momentum at different origins and to clarify the implications of zero total linear momentum.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on how to approach the proof, suggesting starting with the definitions of angular momentum and considering the effects of shifting the origin. There is acknowledgment of the correctness of the reasoning presented by one participant, indicating a productive direction in the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working within the constraints of a homework problem, focusing on the theoretical aspects of angular momentum and its dependence on linear momentum conditions.

Saitama
Messages
4,244
Reaction score
93

Homework Statement


Show that if the total linear momentum of system of particles is zero, the angular momentum of the system is same about all origins.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I really don't know where to begin with this. I am not good at these kind of proofs. I need a few hints on how to approach such problems.

Any help is appreciated. Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You want to prove a general result. So, start with the most general definition of the total angular momentum of a system of particles. See what happens to this expression if you shift the origin.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Start by writing up what you know, namely the expression for the total linear momentum (which you know is zero) and the total angular momentum for some arbitrary points a and b. You then may want to look at how each relative vector from point b to a particle relates to the relative vector from point a to same particle?
 
TSny said:
You want to prove a general result. So, start with the most general definition of the total angular momentum of a system of particles. See what happens to this expression if you shift the origin.

Angular momentum for a particle is defined as
$$\vec{L}=\vec{r}\times \vec{p}$$
where ##\vec{r}## is the radius vector of the particle from some fixed point (origin) and ##\vec{p}## is the momentum of particle.

For a system of particle,
$$\vec{L}=\sum_i \vec{r_i} \times \vec{p_i}$$
where i denotes the ith particle.

Shifting the origin, the new position vector for the ith particle is
$$\vec{r_i'}=\vec{r_i}-\vec{R}$$
Hence,
$$\vec{L'}=\sum_i \vec{r_i'}\times \vec{p_i}=\sum_i(\vec{r_i}-\vec{R})\times p_i$$
$$\Rightarrow \vec{L'}=\vec{L}-\sum_i \vec{R}\times \vec{p_i}$$
The second term is zero, hence proved.

Is this the correct way? Did I use the right words?

Thank you TSny! :)
 
Pranav-Arora said:
Angular momentum for a particle is defined as
$$\vec{L}=\vec{r}\times \vec{p}$$
where ##\vec{r}## is the radius vector of the particle from some fixed point (origin) and ##\vec{p}## is the momentum of particle.

For a system of particle,
$$\vec{L}=\sum_i \vec{r_i} \times \vec{p_i}$$
where i denotes the ith particle.

Shifting the origin, the new position vector for the ith particle is
$$\vec{r_i'}=\vec{r_i}-\vec{R}$$
Hence,
$$\vec{L'}=\sum_i \vec{r_i'}\times \vec{p_i}=\sum_i(\vec{r_i}-\vec{R})\times p_i$$
$$\Rightarrow \vec{L'}=\vec{L}-\sum_i \vec{R}\times \vec{p_i}$$
The second term is zero, hence proved.

Is this the correct way? Did I use the right words?

Thank you TSny! :)

Looks right to me. The final result is more obvious if you write out explicitly that $$\sum_i \vec{R}\times \vec{p_i} = \vec{R}\times \sum_i \vec{p_i}$$
 
TSny said:
Looks right to me. The final result is more obvious if you write out explicitly that $$\sum_i \vec{R}\times \vec{p_i} = \vec{R}\times \sum_i \vec{p_i}$$

Got it, thanks a lot TSny! :smile:
 

Similar threads

Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
1K
Replies
67
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K