Why Is There a Maximum Electric Field Point Outside a Charged Ring?

AI Thread Summary
In a uniformly charged ring, the electric field is zero at the center due to charge cancellation and approaches zero at infinity. There exists a specific point along the axis of the ring, referred to as point X, where the electric field reaches its maximum. This phenomenon occurs because the contributions of the electric field from different parts of the ring combine to create a peak at point X. To determine the electric field at this point, Coulomb's law can be applied, integrating the force from infinitesimal charge elements around the ring. The resulting formula for the electric field shows how it varies with distance from the ring, explaining the maximum observed.
Brad_1234
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
In a uniformly charged ring of radius r, if there is an imaginary line from the center of the ring extending outward
||
||
||
||-----------------X-------------------------------> infinity
||
||
||

At the center of the ring I am told the charges cancel so the net charge is zero. And at infinity, the charge is so small it approaches zero.

Going out from the ring, there is some point X where the charge is greatest.

Why does this effect take place? How to figure out the field energy lines that have an effect on point X?

tia
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you have to determine maximum Elecric field on the axis of the ring
 
You can work this out just using coulombs law. Work out the force on a particle at a distance s due to an infinitismal point of the ring and then integrate around the ring. If you do it right you'll get.
E=K\frac{qz}{(z^2+R^2)^\frac{3}{2}}
where q is the total charge on the ring and z is the distance along the perpendicular axis.
I don't think this really answers your question but perhaps if you plot it, it might be of some help. It at least explains why there is a point where the electric field is at a maximum.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top