Finding the phase angle in simple harmonic motion

AI Thread Summary
In the discussion about finding the phase angle in simple harmonic motion, the user successfully calculated the amplitude of a block-spring system as 1.10 m using the formula A = √(x_i² + v_i²/ω²). However, they struggled with determining the phase angle, initially calculating it as 1.49 radians but later realizing it should be π/2 radians due to a sign error in their velocity equation. The user acknowledged that rounding errors can significantly impact results, especially when computed values are not precise. They expressed frustration over the confusion caused by directionality in their calculations. Ultimately, the discussion highlights the importance of accuracy and attention to detail in physics problems.
erik-the-red
Messages
88
Reaction score
1
Question:

A frictionless block of mass 2.35 kg is attached to an ideal spring with force constant 310 N/m. At t=0 the spring is neither stretched nor compressed and the block is moving in the negative direction at a speed of 12.6 m/s.

1. Find the amplitude.

I got this without a problem. I used the formula A = square root of x_i^2 + v_i^2/\omega^2. \omega = \sqrt{k/m} = 11.49 rad/s. Plugging in known values results in 1.10 m, which is correct.

2. Find the phase angle.

Here's where I don't know why my answer is not correct.

I use the equation v_i = -\omega * A * sin(\omega*t + \phi). I know the initial velocity, I know the angular frequency, and I know the amplitude. I'm solving for the angle in radians.

-12.6 = -(11.49)(1.10)(sin(\phi) This is at time t, so \omega * t = 0.

I get \phi = 85.5 ^\circ. Converting it into radians, it's 1.49 (rad).

This isn't right, though.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
If your numbers were computed a bit more accurately, you'd get:
-12.6 = - (12.6) \sin \phi, or
1 = \sin \phi, thus \phi = \pi /2 (radians)
 
Last edited:
My response is, "My answer is off by an additive constant."

I'm solving for a phase angle here, \phi. What additive constant could possibly exist?
 
I messed up the sign in my previous post (D'oh!); your first answer was close. (See my correction.)
 
Thanks. My idea of direction was screwed up, but it didn't matter for the first part of the question because velocity is squared.

Round once too many and the error becomes greater than two percent. Argh.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top