3 point electrical charge problem

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the electric field at the origin due to three point charges with specified magnitudes and positions. The user initially calculated the distances and magnitudes of the electric fields from each charge but encountered discrepancies with the textbook's answers. They realized that using the law of cosines and considering the correct angles for each charge was necessary for accurate vector addition. The user struggled with understanding the angle adjustments for charges in different quadrants, particularly why certain angles were calculated as 180 degrees minus the reference angle. The conversation highlights the importance of careful angle management in vector calculations for electric fields.
ievans_wsu
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Given 3 point charges as follows:
1) a +2.5uC charge at (-0.20m , 0.15m)
2) a -4.8uC charge at (0.50m , -0.35m)
3) a -6.3uC charge at (-0.42m , 0.32m)

What is the electric field at the origin (0,0)?

Homework Equations



E = (k * q) / (r^2) (To find the magnitude)

k = 9.0e9 (N m^2)/C^2

Etotal = Ex + Ey

Vx = (Magnitude * Cos(θ) )
Vy = (Magnitude * Sin(θ) )

The Attempt at a Solution



First, I plotted each point on a plane, and found the distance each point was from the origin using basic trig.

Point 1 had a distance of .25m
Point 2 had a distance of .61m
Point 3 had a distance of .53m

From there, I found the magnitude using the first stated equation.

E1 = 3.6e5 N/C
E2 = 1.2e5 N/C
E3 = 2.0e5 N/C

My textbook ends here saying that the addition of the vector magnitudes along the X axis should yield Ex. If i do that, I get E1 + E2 - E3 which equates out to be roughly 2.8e5. The answer in the back of the book states 2.1e5 is the correct answer. So, I did some online digging and found that the law of cosines is needed, but is not stated anywhere in the textbook sample problem. The angles I found were as followed

1) 37°
2) 35°
3) 38°

Using these angles in the equation of (Magnitude)(cos(Angle) I found the following new values

E1 = 2.88e5
E2 = 9.5e4
E3 = 1.59e5

Adding these in the manner stated before (E1 + E2 - E3) I get 2.24e5, which satisfies the X component of the problem. Now, when it comes to the Y component, I found that if you take the Sine of the angles above, and multiply them by the magnitude, it should result in the overall Y vector. The book states that -4.1e3 should be the answer, but I get nowhere near that answer. I get -1.58e5. It's been a while since I've taken physics so I'm a bit rusty. Are there any steps or equations that I'm not seeing? Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have to be more careful with the angles. In particular make sure you're getting the angle in the correct quadrant. I'm getting

1) 180 - 36.9 = 143.1°
2) -35.0°
3) 180 - 37.3 = 142.7°
 
Okay, I completely forgot about the sign changes between quadrants. My question though is why is point 3 180 - 37.3? Cosine is postive in Quadrant IV, I'm just not sure why 180 is being used to get the angle. Thanks!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top