A cylinder with cross-section area A floats with its long axis vertical

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem involving a 5.0-cm-diameter cylinder floating in water and the work required to push it 11 cm deeper into the water. The problem is situated within the context of fluid mechanics and buoyancy.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the relationship between force and work, questioning how to calculate the work done based on the displacement of water and the forces involved. There are inquiries about the variables in the equation provided and the correct interpretation of the cross-sectional area of the cylinder.

Discussion Status

Several participants have offered guidance on identifying variables and clarifying concepts related to buoyancy and work. There is an ongoing exploration of the calculations needed, with some participants expressing confusion about the units and the application of formulas. No consensus has been reached yet, as participants continue to clarify their understanding and address assumptions.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the problem is a homework assignment and express the need for clarity on the definitions of terms and the correct application of formulas. There are discussions about the assumptions made regarding the body of water and the implications for the calculations.

  • #31
haruspex said:
##\pi## is not equal to 10.
im being dumb sorry its 19.63
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
BlackPhysics said:
im being dumb sorry its 19.63
19.63= π * 2.5^2
 
  • #33
BlackPhysics said:
19.63= π * 2.5^2
Ok, now that you have that. Is it a good idea to multiply units of ## \rm{cm}^2## and ##\rm{m}## etc...as you have done in post #22? Firstly, its best to work with all variables until the calculation step, but if you insist, I think you should convert all figures to standard units.
 
  • #34
erobz said:
Ok, now that you have that. Is it a good idea to multiply units of ## \rm{cm}^2## and ##\rm{m}## etc...as you have done in post #22? Firstly, its best to work with all variables until the calculation step, but if you insist, I think you should convert all figures to standard units.
(0.01963m) * 1000 kg. m^3 * 9.8 m/s^2 * (0.11m)
Area Density G X
 
  • #35
BlackPhysics said:
(0.01963m) * 1000 kg. m^3 * 9.8 m/s^2 * (0.11m)
Area Density G X
Ok, but the units are ##\rm{m}^2## on area. you have ##\rm{m}##, otherwise the values are ok.

Now we can move on to the definition of Work. What is it?
 
  • #36
erobz said:
Ok, but the units are ##\rm{m}^2## on area. you have ##\rm{m}##, otherwise the values are ok.

Now we can move on to the definition of Work. What is it?
Work = force * distance
 
  • #37
BlackPhysics said:
Work = force * distance
Only if the Force is constant over the applied displacement (and in the same direction). Is the Buoyant Force going to be constant over the ##11 \, \rm{cm}## displacment?
 
  • #38
BlackPhysics said:
Work = force * distance
Not necessarily. A formula means nothing unless you can state exactly what the variables mean in relation to each other. For this equation, what must be the relationship between the distance and the force?
 
  • #39
erobz said:
Only if the Force is constant over the applied displacement. Is the Buoyant Force going to be constant over the ##11 \, \rm{cm} displacment?
it is not constant...
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: erobz
  • #40
BlackPhysics said:
it is not constant...
so knowing its not constant now what? how can i calculate the Force.
 
  • #41
And actually ##F## is the applied force here...It's not the Buoyant force. My bad. How ##F## varies over the displacement ##x## relates to the Buoyant Force.
 
  • #42
BlackPhysics said:
so knowing its not constant now what? how can i calculate the Force.
Have you had any Calculus? If you are given this problem, you should probably be acquainted with the subject.

EDIT:
Or because of the linearity in this specific problem there is an equivalent route that doesn't use Calculus.
 
  • #43
erobz said:
Have you had any Calculus? If you are given this problem, you should be acquainted with the subject.
yes i know calculus. Do i just take the integral of the formula?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: erobz
  • #44
BlackPhysics said:
yes i know calculus. Do i just take the integral of the formula?
You could, but there's an easier way. Think of the displaced mass of water. Where was its centre of mass at first, and where is it at the end?
Edit: on second thoughts, that way is no simpler. Stick with the integration or use the linearity of the force as a function of displacement.
 
Last edited:
  • #45
im guess it would be in the center to start and after the water is displaced it has to move
 
  • #46
BlackPhysics said:
yes i know calculus. Do i just take the integral of the formula?
Yes, ##W = \int F \cdot dx ## or you could consider that since the relationship is linear ## \int F \cdot dx = W = F_{avg} \Delta x ## or you could do whatever @haruspex has planned.
 
  • #47
erobz said:
Yes, ##W = \int F \cdot dx ## or you could consider that since the relationship is linear ## \int F \cdot dx = W = F_{avg} \Delta x ## or you could do whatever @haruspex has planned.
F = (0.01963m^2) * 1000 kg. m^3 * 9.8 m/s^2 * (0.11m)
F = 2.1166W = F * (Delta X)
0.2328J = 2.1166 * 0.11m

Does it look like this?
The average force is just the mass * gravity?
 
  • #48
BlackPhysics said:
F = (0.01963m^2) * 1000 kg. m^3 * 9.8 m/s^2 * (0.11m)
F = 2.1166W = F * (Delta X)
0.2328 = 2.1166 * 0.11m

Does it look like this?
The average force is just the mass * gravity?
##\pi 2.5^2cm^2## is not 0.0196… m2. Check your conversion from ##cm^2## to ##m^2##.
You still have not said what that F represents. What force is it?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: erobz
  • #49
haruspex said:
##\pi 2.5^2## is not 0.0196… Check your conversion from ##cm^2## to ##m^2##.
You still have not said what that F represents. What force is it?
F is the buoyancy force
F = (0.1963m^2) * 1000 kg. m^3 * 9.8 m/s^2 * (0.11m)
F = 192.42251
 
  • #50
BlackPhysics said:
F is the buoyancy force
No it isn't. The buoyancy force depends on the weight of the cylinder, which we do not know.
 
  • #51
BlackPhysics said:
F = (0.01963m^2) * 1000 kg. m^3 * 9.8 m/s^2 * (0.11m)
F = 2.1166W = F * (Delta X)
0.2328 = 2.1166 * 0.11m

Does it look like this?
The average force is just the mass * gravity?
No, the average Force is not ##mg##.
BlackPhysics said:
F is the buoyancy force
F = (0.1963m^2) * 1000 kg. m^3 * 9.8 m/s^2 * (0.11m)
F = 192.42251
##F## is not the Buoyant Force here, it is the force which you push with to counter the Buoyant Force.

And re -re check the area...it has gotten worse!
 
  • #52
erobz said:
F is not the Buoyant Force here, it is the force which you push.
Since the force of push is variable, it's not exactly that either.
 
  • #53
haruspex said:
Since the force of push is variable, it's not exactly that either.
$$dF = \gamma d {V\llap{-}}_D$$

Is that not the force required to overcome the buoyancy of the cylinder in a quasistatic equilibrium?
 
  • #54
F = (0.001963M^2) * 1000 kg. m^3 * 9.8 m/s^2 * (0.11m)
F = 2.1166W = F * (Delta X)
0.2328J = 2.1166 * 0.11m

ok so i converted cm^2 to m^2

and the force is not the buoyant force.
So I am guessing its the force that is pushing the cylinder in the water?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: erobz
  • #55
BlackPhysics said:
F = (0.001963M^2) * 1000 kg. m^3 * 9.8 m/s^2 * (0.11m)
F = 2.1166W = F * (Delta X)
0.2328J = 2.1166 * 0.11m

ok so i converted cm^2 to m^2

and the force is not the buoyant force.
So I am guessing its the force that is pushing the cylinder in the water?
But the work is the average force times the displacment. You have not calculated the average force, you have calculated the final force at depth ##x= 11 \, \rm{cm}##

Also, the units of force are missing.
 
  • #56
erobz said:
But the work is the average force times the displacment. You have not calculated the average force, you have calculated the final force at depth ##x= 11 \, \rm{cm}##

Also, the units of force are missing.
How do you calculate that without time? average force = f = m(VI-VF)/T
 
  • #57
BlackPhysics said:
How do you calculate that without time? average force = f = m(VI-VF)/T

The force is a function of ##x##, not time.

Or, just do the integral if you are familiar with calculus.
 
  • #58
erobz said:
you have calculated the final force at depth 11cm
Yes, that was my point.
BlackPhysics said:
How do you calculate that without time?
That's a fair question. You are right that average force is change in momentum/elapsed time. But here we are dealing with work, not momentum, so you want the force at the average displacement.
When just starting to push the cylinder down, the slightest force will do. The force needed increases linearly with depth up to the maximum calculated by your equation. So, if you integrate the force wrt depth, what do you get?
 
  • #59
haruspex said:
Yes, that was my point.

That's a fair question. You are right that average force is change in momentum/elapsed time. But here we are dealing with work, not momentum, so you want the force at the average displacement.
When just starting to push the cylinder down, the slightest force will do. The force needed increases linearly with depth up to the maximum calculated by your equation. So, if you integrate the force wrt depth, what do you get?
2.327? is that right?
 
  • #60
BlackPhysics said:
2.327? is that right?
W = 2.327 * x?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
8K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
10K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
7K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K