A Galvanometer of Coil Resistance 50 Ω Deflects Full Scale....

AI Thread Summary
A galvanometer with a coil resistance of 50.0 Ω deflects full scale at 3.50 mA. To construct a voltmeter that deflects full scale for 35.0 V, the required series resistance is calculated using the formula Rv = (Vv/I) - Rg, resulting in Rv = 9,950 Ω. This indicates that the total resistance for the setup would be 10,000 Ω. Feedback from peers confirmed the correctness of the calculations and reasoning. The discussion emphasizes the importance of verifying calculations in physics problems.
AUAO1
Messages
2
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


A galvanometer of coil resistance 50.0 Ω deflects full scale for a current of 3.50 mA. What series resistance should be used with this galvanometer to construct a voltmeter which deflects full scale for 35.0 V

Homework Equations

/Known Variables
[/B]
R1 + R2... + Rn = Rtotal
R = V/I
Vv = 35V; Rg = 50 Ω; I = 3.50 mA or 0.0035 A

The Attempt at a Solution


Since a voltmeter occurs in a series, I have used the relevant equation above (Rv + Rg = Rtotal) where Rtotal = Vv/I (since current is constant). Replacing Rtotal with Vv/I gives Rv + Rg = Vv/I, so to find the resistance of the voltmeter, it would be Rv = (Vv/I) - Rg. Substituting the values in gives (35/0.0035) - 50 so Rv = 9,950 Ω (9.95 x 10^3 Ω). This means that Rtotal = 10,000 Ω (1.00 x 10^4 Ω).

Help and feedback is very much appreciated!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi AUAO1,

Welcome to Physics Forums!

Your reasoning and results look good.

They ask for the required resistance to put in series with the galvanometer, which you found to be 9950 Ω. The value of Rtotal wasn't necessary, but it's nice that you calculated it, too.
 
  • Like
Likes AUAO1
Hello and thank you gneill!

Thank you for the quick response and feedback. It's always nice to be sure that I'm on the right track with these questions so your help is much appreciated!
 
  • Like
Likes gneill
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top