A grinder has a 6.01 kg steel block on a 1.46 m long arm.

  • Thread starter Thread starter KingKell
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Arm Block Steel
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the coefficient of friction for a 6.01 kg steel block on a 1.46 m arm with an angular acceleration of -1.62 rads/s². The user expresses difficulty in solving the problem, particularly in drawing the free body diagram. There are inquiries about additional information or pictures that could assist in understanding the problem better. Participants clarify that no pictures are available to aid in the explanation. The focus remains on the physics principles needed to solve for the coefficient of friction.
KingKell
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A grinder consists of a 6.01 kg steel block on a 1.46 m long arm that spins around a table. If the angular acceleration is -1.62 rads/s2, what is the coefficient of friction between the steel block and the table?

I'm having trouble with attempting the question, especially drawing free body diagram for this problem.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
KingKell said:

Homework Statement



A grinder consists of a 6.01 kg steel block on a 1.46 m long arm that spins around a table. If the angular acceleration is -1.62 rads/s2, what is the coefficient of friction between the steel block and the table?

I'm having trouble with attempting the question, especially drawing free body diagram for this problem.
Are there any pictures which go with this problem? Any other information which you may not have included?

Please don't delete parts of the HW template.
 
SteamKing said:
Are there any pictures which go with this problem? Any other information which you may not have included?

Please don't delete parts of the HW template.

No there were no pictures.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top