A problem regarding to Lagrangian in Classical Mechanics

iiternal
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I have a problem regarding to lagrangian.

If L is a Lagrangian for a system of n degrees of freedom satisfying Lagrange's equations, show by direct substitution that

L' = L + \frac{d F(q_1,...,q_n,t)}{d t}

also satisfies Lagrange's equations where F is any ARBITRARY BUT DIFFERENTIABLE function of its arguments.

Homework Equations


Lagrange's equations:
\frac{\partial L}{\partial q_i} - \frac{d}{d t}\frac{\partial L}{\dot{\partial q_i}} =0

The Attempt at a Solution


Equivalently we have to find
\frac{\partial F}{\partial q_i} - \frac{d}{d t}\frac{\partial F}{\partial \dot{q_i}} =0
It is obvious that \frac{\partial F}{\partial \dot{q_i}}=0.
But how can I get \frac{\partial F}{\partial q_i}=0 ?

Thank you.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF, iiternal! :smile:

This looks like an exercise in multivariable differentiation.

Let's start with your relevant equation.
You seem to have dropped a partial derivative there...

I'm afraid that since F is an arbitrary function of ##q_i##, you won't get ##\frac{\partial F}{\partial q_i}=0##.

I believe you have to substitute L' in Lagrange's equation and expand everything.
This means expanding dF/dt into partial derivatives.
Do you know how to do that?
 
Thank you very much! You are absolutely right!

let ## G = \frac{dF}{dt} = \sum\frac{\partial F}{\partial q_i}\dot{q_i}+\frac{\partial F}{\partial t}##;
Substitute it into Lagrange's Equation
## \frac{\partial G}{\partial q_i} - \frac{d}{dt}\frac{\partial G}{\partial \dot{q_i}}
= (\frac{\partial^2F}{\partial q_i^2}\dot{q} + \frac{\partial^2F}{\partial q_i\partial t}) - \frac{d}{dt}\frac{\partial F}{\partial q_i} ##

I believe the last term can somehow cancel both the first two terms.
When I tried to expand the last term, I faced another problem
## \frac{d}{dt}\frac{\partial F}{\partial q_i} = \frac{\partial }{\partial q}\frac{\partial F}{\partial t} + ?##
How can I take derivative of the denominator of a differentiation?

I like Serena said:
Welcome to PF, iiternal! :smile:

This looks like an exercise in multivariable differentiation.

Let's start with your relevant equation.
You seem to have dropped a partial derivative there...

I'm afraid that since F is an arbitrary function of ##q_i##, you won't get ##\frac{\partial F}{\partial q_i}=0##.

I believe you have to substitute L' in Lagrange's equation and expand everything.
This means expanding dF/dt into partial derivatives.
Do you know how to do that?
 
iiternal said:
Thank you very much! You are absolutely right!

let ## G = \frac{dF}{dt} = \sum\frac{\partial F}{\partial q_i}\dot{q_i}+\frac{\partial F}{\partial t}##;
Substitute it into Lagrange's Equation
## \frac{\partial G}{\partial q_i} - \frac{d}{dt}\frac{\partial G}{\partial \dot{q_i}}
= (\frac{\partial^2F}{\partial q_i^2}\dot{q} + \frac{\partial^2F}{\partial q_i\partial t}) - \frac{d}{dt}\frac{\partial F}{\partial q_i} ##

I believe the last term can somehow cancel both the first two terms.
When I tried to expand the last term, I faced another problem
## \frac{d}{dt}\frac{\partial F}{\partial q_i} = \frac{\partial }{\partial q}\frac{\partial F}{\partial t} + ?##
How can I take derivative of the denominator of a differentiation?

Good! :)

I'm afraid you should not use the index i everywhere and keep the summations.

Your equations should read:
## G = \frac{dF}{dt} = \sum\limits_j\frac{\partial F}{\partial q_j}\dot{q_j}+\frac{\partial F}{\partial t} ##

Substitute it into Lagrange's Equation
## \frac{\partial G}{\partial q_i} - \frac{d}{dt}\frac{\partial G}{\partial \dot{q_i}}
= \sum\limits_j ... ##

And:
## \frac{d}{dt}\frac{\partial F}{\partial q_i} = \sum\limits_j {\partial^2 F \over \partial q_j\partial q_i} \dot q_j + {\partial^2 F \over \partial t\partial q_i}##
 
Great !
Thank you very much!
Happy New Year.

I like Serena said:
Good! :)

I'm afraid you should not use the index i everywhere and keep the summations.

Your equations should read:
## G = \frac{dF}{dt} = \sum\limits_j\frac{\partial F}{\partial q_j}\dot{q_j}+\frac{\partial F}{\partial t} ##

Substitute it into Lagrange's Equation
## \frac{\partial G}{\partial q_i} - \frac{d}{dt}\frac{\partial G}{\partial \dot{q_i}}
= \sum\limits_j ... ##

And:
## \frac{d}{dt}\frac{\partial F}{\partial q_i} = \sum\limits_j {\partial^2 F \over \partial q_j\partial q_i} \dot q_j + {\partial^2 F \over \partial t\partial q_i}##
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top