I A question about dehumidifiers and condensation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the design of heat sinks in dehumidifiers, specifically the use of thick, well-spaced fins versus thinner fins. Thick fins may facilitate water droplet formation and prevent bridging, while thinner fins could potentially enhance heat transfer efficiency under certain humidity conditions. The conversation highlights the importance of achieving a low cold sink temperature to maximize condensation effectiveness, especially in high humidity scenarios. Additionally, there are concerns about the condensate acting as an insulator, which could hinder performance. Overall, the design of dehumidifiers is a balance between effective condensation and efficient humidity reduction.
YoshiBeans
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Hi guys!

My question is about the heat sinks (cold side) used in some dehumidifiers. It appears that thick, well spaced fins are used, as opposed to a larger number of thin fins, which I would expect to provide better heat transfer.

download.jpg


Am I right in assuming that this is to allow space for water droplets to form and fall without bridging the gap between fins?

Or is it because the extra surface area would be conterproductive as it would mean a larger quantity of air would need to be reduced to the dew point before the heat transfer becomes useful? If so, would the multiple thin fins be more efficient in the hyperthetical case of 100% humidity?

Any insight would be appreciated.

Thanks in advance.

Johann
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
A small cold sink will reach a lower temperature for a given rate of heat transfer. I would imagine that would make for more effective condensation because you want to be well below the dew point.
 
  • Like
Likes Nik_2213
sophiecentaur said:
A small cold sink will reach a lower temperature for a given rate of heat transfer. I would imagine that would make for more effective condensation because you want to be well below the dew point.

So you would agree with the hypothetical about the 100% humidity?
 
YoshiBeans said:
So you would agree with the hypothetical about the 100% humidity?

I guess so. But the point of a dehumidifier is to reduce humidity, is it not? Otoh, if it is used as a condenser, the design could be different (?).
 
sophiecentaur said:
I guess so. But the point of a dehumidifier is to reduce humidity, is it not? Otoh, if it is used as a condenser, the design could be different (?).

True, but unfortunately I can't find much on condenser heat sink design as they are normally larger and use finned pipes with gas or fluid refrigerant instead.
 
So what do you actually want to achieve?
I still think that the cold sink temperature needs to be as low as possible and that is why it's relative small. There is a problem in getting rid of the condensate fast enough because it tends to act as an insulator, increasing the equilibrium temperature of the surface in contact with the air. The hot sink needs to work with radiation or convection whereas the cold sink works by contact with the damp air and should avoid heat gain by radiation as that would reduce the condensation rate. (I just thought of that but I think it must be relevant)
 
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks
I am attempting to use a Raman TruScan with a 785 nm laser to read a material for identification purposes. The material causes too much fluorescence and doesn’t not produce a good signal. However another lab is able to produce a good signal consistently using the same Raman model and sample material. What would be the reason for the different results between instruments?
Back
Top