sophiecentaur
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
- 30,064
- 7,374
You have a point there but the statistics of electric shock are pretty good in the UK because the spec for the equipment is very high and, for the past many years, there has been a requirement for RCD protection. You need to have a certificate for any domestic electrical installations if you want a prospective buyer to get a mortgage so there is very little that your average tinkerer can get away with. I couldn't get like for like comparison on relative number of fatal shocks in UK and US but http://rjqelectrical.co.uk/2013/04/electrical-safety-statistics/ suggests 28 fatalities per year (0.05 per 100,000 total) in UK and this link suggests about 0.2 per 100,000 (industrial) in the US. That doesn't lead one to think that the 240V issue is particularlyrelevant.jim hardy said:So i will tease Sophie - his 230 volt system is 'unsafe at any speed.'
Better? 240V house wiring is cheaper and appliance leads are thinner. Afaik, the only reason for going away from a simple 120V (=100V) standard in the US was that it wasn't suitable for heating appliances (thick wire etc) and they thought quickly and came up with this dual voltage system which is compatible with both requirements. The split phase feature was a reasonable enough strategy which makes best use of the available copper. I would imagine that people in the UK are actually more scared of 240V and tend to treat it more carefully. 120V is just not scary enough; you can usually cope with a 120V contact without ruffling your feathers but 240V does make you jump. UK plugs and sockets are bulky and expensive but, at the same time, comforting. The fuse in every 13A plug is (should be) tailored to the lead / cord to each device to provide good protection against thin leads catching fire when abused.Averagesupernova said:Ok so is this thread ready to turn into split phase is better than 240 volt single phase used in the UK? If so I am totally on board!
Last edited by a moderator: