Acceleration changing over time

  • Thread starter Thread starter nicklasaau
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Acceleration Time
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the distance and velocity of a particle in a dynamic system where acceleration varies over time. The user struggles with integrating the changing acceleration to find the end distance and velocity, relying on initial conditions. The acceleration function is specified as a function of time and distance, requiring double integration to derive the necessary equations. Suggestions include using integration by parts to simplify the calculations. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the need for calculus to solve the problem effectively.
nicklasaau
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hey, i am having trouble doing the calculation on a dynamic system.

My acceleration is not constant during, and because of that my speed of the particle is changing from the original, and i want to know how long my particle has moved in a short periode of time Δt and what the velocity is. with the math i have learned so far, i end up with only taking into account the end velocity or the beginning velocity, instead of calculating it is changing


Know is
Beginning condition: (distance, speed)
Travel: (acceleration at a specific time, that changes)
I want to know end distance and end velocity.

At the end i need to rewrite it to a transfer function, so i have to do linearization if that can help in the calculation :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A general solution will require calculus, but it's possible you won't need this.

velocity: v(t) = ∫a(t)dt + v0
displacement: x(t) = ∫(v(t))dt + x0 = ∫(∫a(t)dt + v0)dt + x0

v0, x0 are the velocity and displacement at t=0 (initial conditions).

You will need to integrate the acceleration a(t) twice to get a distance, and the method of solution will depend on the form of a(t). Do you know anything about the form of a(t)?
 
The object is a levitating beam, and because of that the acceleration is a function of time and distance



a(t,x) = (μ * N^2 * Ag)/4 * [I*sin(ωt + ρ)]^2 / x^2, or something like that
 
MikeyW said:
A general solution will require calculus, but it's possible you won't need this.

velocity: v(t) = ∫a(t)dt + v0
displacement: x(t) = ∫(v(t))dt + x0 = ∫(∫a(t)dt + v0)dt + x0

v0, x0 are the velocity and displacement at t=0 (initial conditions).

You will need to integrate the acceleration a(t) twice to get a distance, and the method of solution will depend on the form of a(t). Do you know anything about the form of a(t)?

That double integral involving a(t) can be reexpressed as a single integral by integrating by parts to obtain:

\int_0^t(t-\lambda)a(\lambda) d\lambda

where λ is a dummy variable of integration.
 
Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'
Here are two fragments from Banach's monograph in Mechanics I have never seen the term <<velocity of transport>> in English texts. Actually I have never seen this term being named somehow in English. This term has a name in Russian books. I looked through the original Banach's text in Polish and there is a Polish name for this term. It is a little bit surprising that the Polish name differs from the Russian one and also differs from this English translation. My question is: Is there...
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
6K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
28
Views
3K
Back
Top