Acceleration changing over time

  • Thread starter Thread starter nicklasaau
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Acceleration Time
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the distance and velocity of a particle in a dynamic system where acceleration varies over time. The user struggles with integrating the changing acceleration to find the end distance and velocity, relying on initial conditions. The acceleration function is specified as a function of time and distance, requiring double integration to derive the necessary equations. Suggestions include using integration by parts to simplify the calculations. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the need for calculus to solve the problem effectively.
nicklasaau
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hey, i am having trouble doing the calculation on a dynamic system.

My acceleration is not constant during, and because of that my speed of the particle is changing from the original, and i want to know how long my particle has moved in a short periode of time Δt and what the velocity is. with the math i have learned so far, i end up with only taking into account the end velocity or the beginning velocity, instead of calculating it is changing


Know is
Beginning condition: (distance, speed)
Travel: (acceleration at a specific time, that changes)
I want to know end distance and end velocity.

At the end i need to rewrite it to a transfer function, so i have to do linearization if that can help in the calculation :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A general solution will require calculus, but it's possible you won't need this.

velocity: v(t) = ∫a(t)dt + v0
displacement: x(t) = ∫(v(t))dt + x0 = ∫(∫a(t)dt + v0)dt + x0

v0, x0 are the velocity and displacement at t=0 (initial conditions).

You will need to integrate the acceleration a(t) twice to get a distance, and the method of solution will depend on the form of a(t). Do you know anything about the form of a(t)?
 
The object is a levitating beam, and because of that the acceleration is a function of time and distance



a(t,x) = (μ * N^2 * Ag)/4 * [I*sin(ωt + ρ)]^2 / x^2, or something like that
 
MikeyW said:
A general solution will require calculus, but it's possible you won't need this.

velocity: v(t) = ∫a(t)dt + v0
displacement: x(t) = ∫(v(t))dt + x0 = ∫(∫a(t)dt + v0)dt + x0

v0, x0 are the velocity and displacement at t=0 (initial conditions).

You will need to integrate the acceleration a(t) twice to get a distance, and the method of solution will depend on the form of a(t). Do you know anything about the form of a(t)?

That double integral involving a(t) can be reexpressed as a single integral by integrating by parts to obtain:

\int_0^t(t-\lambda)a(\lambda) d\lambda

where λ is a dummy variable of integration.
 
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
I know that mass does not affect the acceleration in a simple pendulum undergoing SHM, but how does the mass on the spring that makes up the elastic pendulum affect its acceleration? Certainly, there must be a change due to the displacement from equilibrium caused by each differing mass? I am talking about finding the acceleration at a specific time on each trial with different masses and comparing them. How would they compare and why?

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
6K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
28
Views
3K
Back
Top