Acceleration of two masses on pulley.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the acceleration of two connected masses on a pulley system, with specific coefficients of friction provided. The user initially derived equations for tension and acceleration but expressed confusion over the relationship between the accelerations of the two masses. A suggestion was made to use conservation of energy for a clearer solution, avoiding the complexities of forces acting on the pulley. The importance of correctly applying static and kinetic friction was highlighted, along with the need to ensure the equations accurately reflect the system's dynamics. Ultimately, the conversation emphasizes the need for careful consideration of forces and relationships in such mechanical problems.
ladymiresa
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Two masses are connected by massless and frictionless pulleys and string. The coefficients of friction are µs = 0.35 and µk = 0.25 between mass m1 and the table. The masses are m1 = 8.0 kg and m2 = 8.0 kg.
EHnDWHJ.png

Find the acceleration of each mass and the tension in the string. (Note: Because of the pulley, if m1 moves a distance L, then m2 moves half that amount, a distance L/2. Think about how this affects the relative acceleration of the two blocks.)

Homework Equations


a1=-1/2a2
fk=ukn=-ukm1g
T-ukm1g=m1a1
T-m2g=m2a2

The Attempt at a Solution



I think the acceleration of block 2 will be negative since it is falling and block 1 will have a positive acceleration since it is moving towards the right.
Ok, I hope I am right in assuming that the accelerations are related as I've written above.
I substituted the a2 into into the first T equation to get T-ukg=-(1/2)m1a2.To cancel the T out, I subtracted the equations to get: (m2-ukm1)g=-1/2 (m2+m1)a2

Then punching in my variables I got a2=-7.35 m/s^2 which I was pleased to see is negative. But then if I use my relationship as a1=-1/2 a2 then I get a1=3.7m/s^2, which is at least positive. But I don't think it makes sense that the acceleration of block 2 would be faster than block 1?

I can't decide where I went wrong? I think it might be my relationship between the two accelerations, but today I asked my professor and she said it looked OK. So now I think I messed something up with the friction... I'm using kinetic but the problem also gave static... do I need to use both? Or does fk not equal ukmg?

I'd appreciate any suggestions. Thanks.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The first three equations look OK. It is not obvious to me how you got your fourth equation, as the tension T on the string is not directly pulling the pulley upwards but rather is going around the pulley. I would expect the upward force on ##m_2## to be either half or double of T, but it could be something else. I doubt that it's T though.

When you subtract the two T equations you get
##(m_2-\mu_km_1)g=-\frac{1}{2}(m_2+m_1)a_2##
but the correct subtraction gives
##(m_2-\mu_km_1)g=-\frac{1}{2}(2m_2+m_1)a_2##

I find problems like this easier to do by using conservation of energy, so that we don't need to try to work out difficult things like what is the upward force on ##m_2##.

Approaching it that way, we can write an equation:

KE of m1 + KE of m2 = loss of PE of m2 + distance moved by m1 x sliding frictional force on m1

This gives an equation in tems of ##s_1,s_2,\dot{s}_1,\dot{s}_2## where ##s_i## is the displacement of mass ##i## from its starting position (so that ##a_i=\ddot{s}_i##). Using your first equation, we can reduce that to an equation in ##s_1## and ##\dot{s}_1##, which is easily solved by integrating and using the initial conditions that, presumably ##\dot{s}_1(0)=0## and defining ##s_1(0)## to be 0.

You can then get the accelerations of the two masses by differentiating, and get the tension from your third equation.
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...

Similar threads

Back
Top