Adding energy to an ideal gas without changing internal energy

AI Thread Summary
Energy added to an ideal gas cannot equal the work done by the gas when the gas performs work on the environment, as this results in an increase in temperature and internal energy. The ideal gas law indicates that if pressure and volume increase, the temperature must also increase, leading to a contradiction in the equality of energy added and work done. The discussion highlights that work done by an ideal gas is dependent on temperature changes, suggesting that scenarios with constant temperature may allow for Q to equal W. However, under most conditions where temperature changes, this equality does not hold. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding thermodynamic processes to explore the relationship between heat and work in ideal gases.
Numaholic
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone.

I thought of a question which has been bothering me. It is: Is there a case where energy is added to an ideal gas of constant amount where the energy added will equal the work done by the gas.

My thoughts: The energy of an ideal gas is proportional to the temperature. If the gas is to do work ΔW≠0 W=Fx=PV. If the gas is to do work on the environment then PV will increase. Using the ideal gas equation P1V1/T1=P2V2/T2. If P2V2 > P1V1 then T2 > T1. Therefore energy of the system has increased and it is impossible for the energy added to the ideal gas to equal the work done by the gas.

I don't know if I made an incorrect assumption or faulty argument, but the result doesn't seem intuitive to me. Any thoughts would be appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Numaholic said:
Hi everyone.

I thought of a question which has been bothering me. It is: Is there a case where energy is added to an ideal gas of constant amount where the energy added will equal the work done by the gas.

My thoughts: The energy of an ideal gas is proportional to the temperature. If the gas is to do work ΔW≠0 W=Fx=PV. If the gas is to do work on the environment then PV will increase. Using the ideal gas equation P1V1/T1=P2V2/T2. If P2V2 > P1V1 then T2 > T1. Therefore energy of the system has increased and it is impossible for the energy added to the ideal gas to equal the work done by the gas.

I don't know if I made an incorrect assumption or faulty argument, but the result doesn't seem intuitive to me. Any thoughts would be appreciated!

The amount of work is ∫PdV, not Δ(PV). This integral does not have to be equal to zero when the temperature is held constant (and PV is constant). For an isothermal reversible expansion, ∫PdV = nRT ln(Vfinal/Vinitial)

Chet
 
Is there a case where energy is added to an ideal gas of constant amount where the energy added will equal the work done by the gas.

You are looking for a situation where ##Q = W##

Your argument shows that the work done by an ideal gas is a function of the temperature change.
It has not shown that the heat added to the system cannot be as high as the work done by the system.

You can try seeing what the laws of thermodynamics have to say about Q=W ... or just have another look at the different thermodynamic processes you know about.
You have a nice hint in your working - it loks like any process where the temperature change is non-zero won't have Q=W doesn't it. So look for a process where T2=T1.

[edit: too slow - thanks chet]
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top