Adiabatic Process for an Ideal Gas

cmilho10
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
During the compression stroke of a certain gasoline engine, the pressure increases from 1.00 atm to 20.3 atm. Assume that the process is adiabatic and the gas is ideal with (gamma)= 1.40.

(a) By what factor does the volume change?
Vfinal = (ans)*Vinitial
(b) By what factor does the temperature change (when expressed using an absolute scale)?
Tfinal =(ans) * Tinitial
(c) If the compression starts with 0.0160 mole of gas at 27.5°C, find the values of Q, W, and Eint that characterize the process.

I know the relationship is described by PV^(gamma)=constant but am clueless on how to apply this to get the answers.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
pv ^ gamma = constant means you can write

Pi Vi ^gamma = Pf Vf^gamma. You need to simply rearrange this equation to get Vi/Vf.

for part b:

From PV = nRT, you can write Pi Vi/Ti = Pf Vf /Tf

Since you already know Pi/Pf and Vi/Vf, rearrange the above to get Ti/Tf.

For part c.

If i remember correct for adiabetic process, Q=0. So change in internal energy, dE = dW

and work done on the system W = -intgration (dW) = -intgration (PdV)
where P= nRT/V


Limit of integration is Vi to Vf. You will have to use the given info about mole number and temperature to find vi and vf.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top