Engineering Alternative design for a CE-CC cascade amplifier

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on an alternative design for a common CE-CC cascade amplifier, highlighting the direct connection of the emitter amplifier output to Q2 without coupling capacitors or voltage divider bias. This configuration raises concerns about potential damage to Q2's base-emitter junction due to unwanted output voltage from Q1. The conversation emphasizes the need to recalculate input impedance and bias resistor values to maintain an AC gain of -50 while assuming high transistor gains to simplify calculations. Participants suggest breaking down the circuit by analyzing one stage at a time, starting with the DC operating point of Q1. Overall, the design considerations aim to optimize performance while addressing potential issues in the amplifier configuration.
PhysicsTruth
Messages
117
Reaction score
18
Homework Statement
Given a CE amplifier with gain of about -50, design a buffer emitter follower, mentioning all the parameters that can be controlled by the designer, and connecting the load resistance such that the voltage gain isn't affected.
Relevant Equations
##Z_{in} = \beta (r_{e}+R_{C})##
##A_{v} = -(R_{C}||Z_{in})/r_{e}##
Here is a common CE-CC cascade amplifier-
end10.png


Here, the output of the emitter amplifier is directly connected to Q2, without any coupling capacitor or any voltage divider bias. This may harm the base-emitter junction of Q2 in case of unwanted output voltage from Q1 collector. But in that case, the calculations would change completely, where ##Z_{in}## would be perhaps ##RB1||RB2||[\beta(r_{e} + R_{C})]##, where r_e would be the internal emitter resistance for Q2 and RB1,RB2 are the base biasing resistors. How to account for the output impedance, the impedance matching and the bias resistor values in this case, such that the AC gain remains at -50?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Since transistor types and gains are not given, you can assume transistors with very high (almost infinite) hFE. This allows you to ignore loading effects between succesive stages.

From there you might try simplifying the circuit and calculate one stage at a time. For instance, assume that Q2 does not exist and find the DC operating point of Q1, etc.

Since signal frequency and capacitor values are not specified, they can be 'assumed to be appropriate' for the circuit.
 
Back
Top