Analogies for magazine article related to structural engineering

In summary: Therefore, it is not accurate to assume a simple relationship between the length of the pole and the stress it can withstand. When using longer poles, it is important to properly support them and ensure that they are able to withstand the increased bending moment. In summary, the relationship between the length of a pole and the stress it can withstand is not straightforward and requires proper consideration of various factors.
  • #1
JackDuVal
1
0

Homework Statement


Hi all, I'm writing an article for a scouting magazine. It is a short column to inform people about the danger of using long -badly supported - horizontal poles. I'd like to compare the situation of using a short beam and a long beam, and then able to tell a rough percentage how much worse the long beam is over the short one.

Homework Equations


Bending moment (UDL) = WL^2/8 (Kg-mm or Kg-m)
Bending moment (point load) = Force x Distance ( This is actually for a horizontal beam with load acting is a point load) (Kg-mm or Kg-m)

The Attempt at a Solution


"Image you're building a simple swing. Supports on either side, horizontal pole on top, attach plank with 2 ropes, done! If you made a normal sized swing, using a top pole of 2 meters, you can put Charlie and 3 other friends on it and it'll hold. But if you use a top pole of 4 meters, maybe you can just put Charlie in it."

Idea:
ASSUME: the relation between the length of the pole and the stress is L^2
Swing with 4 meter pole can hold 1 kid, causing stress 1 kid * 4^2 meters = 16
Swing with 2 meter pole can hold 4 kids, causing stress 4 kids * 2^2 meters = 16
This article will be read by people barely able to do vector math, so I have to keep things easy :)

To summarize what I'm looking for: to correct what I put behind ASSUME, with some background info. An article that clarifies it will do as well, I've looked around but couldn't get it clear enough.

Thank you very much!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
The relationship between the length of the pole and the stress is not necessarily linear. The factors that contribute to the bending moment (which determines the stress) depend on the type of loading applied to the beam. For example, if a uniform distributed load (UDL) is applied, the bending moment is calculated as WL^2/8 (where W is the load and L is the length of the beam). On the other hand, if a point load is applied, the bending moment is calculated as Force x Distance. Additionally, the material properties of the beam, such as its Young's modulus, also play an important role in determining the stress.
 

What is structural engineering?

Structural engineering is a branch of civil engineering that deals with the design, construction, and maintenance of structures such as buildings, bridges, and tunnels. It involves analyzing the forces and loads that a structure will be subjected to and designing the most efficient and safe way to support and resist these forces.

How are analogies used in structural engineering?

Analogies are commonly used in structural engineering to explain complex concepts and principles in a more relatable way. They involve comparing a known and familiar object or situation to the structural design or behavior of a building or other structure. This helps to make the information more understandable and memorable for non-engineers and students.

What are some common analogies used in structural engineering?

Some common analogies used in structural engineering include comparing a building's columns and beams to the bones in a human body, or the foundation of a building to the roots of a tree. These analogies help to explain the purpose and function of different structural elements in a relatable way.

Why are analogies important in writing about structural engineering?

Analogies are important in writing about structural engineering because they can make technical and complex information more accessible to a wider audience. By using analogies, structural engineers can communicate their ideas and concepts in a way that is easier to understand and remember, even for those without a technical background.

Are there any limitations to using analogies in structural engineering?

While analogies can be a useful tool in explaining structural engineering concepts, they should be used carefully and with consideration. Analogies are not perfect representations of the technical aspects of structural engineering and can sometimes be misleading if taken too literally. Additionally, analogies may not be universally understood or relatable to all audiences, so they should be used in conjunction with clear and accurate technical explanations.

Similar threads

  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
9K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
11
Views
138K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • DIY Projects
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
1K
Back
Top