Does Angular Momentum Depend on the Choice of Origin?

AI Thread Summary
Angular momentum is dependent on the choice of origin, as calculations vary based on the point of rotation selected. If no torque acts on a particle about a specific origin, the angular momentum remains constant, but it does not imply that it is zero. A particle with constant speed does not necessarily maintain constant angular momentum unless the radius and mass remain unchanged. A planet in a circular orbit cannot have zero total angular momentum, even if it is spinning, as it possesses both rotational and orbital momentum. Lastly, a particle moving in a straight line can have angular momentum, demonstrated by scenarios like a person jumping off a merry-go-round.
sumitmanhas
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
angular momentum urgent help ...

Homework Statement


Which of the following is an accurate statement
1) The angular momentum of a moving particle depends on the specific origin with respect to which the angular momentum is calculated.
2) If the torque acting on a particle is zero about an arbitrary origin, then the angular momentum of the particle is also zero about that origin.
3) If the speed of a particle is constant, then the angular momentum of the particle about any specific origin must also be constant.
4) Consider a planet moving in a circular orbit about a star. Even if the planet is spinning it is not possible for its total angular momentum to be zero.
5) A particle moving in a straight line with constant speed necessarily has zero angular momentum.


Homework Equations


conservation of angular momentum and principles


The Attempt at a Solution



so for the first 1 ) this is likely to be true , which i never thought of because evrytime you calculate your angular momentum you choose the point of rotation and from there using right hand rule determine the direction (in or out)
2) makes no sense because if there is no torque acting on the origin then the angular momentum is constant
3) if speed is constant then angular momentum = mrv is same since the mass remain the same throughout
4)if an object keeps rotating doesn't it have an initial momentum and final momentum which are same , so, i mean it is constant then.
5) particle in straight line can have angular momentum , as in the case of a person jumping of the merry go round with horizontal speed doesnot have zero angular momentum.
i believe the first one is more accurate..
reply as soon as possible please
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi sumitmanhas! :smile:
sumitmanhas said:
1) The angular momentum of a moving particle depends on the specific origin with respect to which the angular momentum is calculated.
so for the first 1 ) this is likely to be true , which i never thought of because evrytime you calculate your angular momentum you choose the point of rotation and from there using right hand rule determine the direction (in or out)

Yes, it is true, but you have to prove it, using the definition.
2) If the torque acting on a particle is zero about an arbitrary origin, then the angular momentum of the particle is also zero about that origin.
2) makes no sense because if there is no torque acting on the origin then the angular momentum is constant


That's sort-of right, but you haven't said whether or not that constant has to be zero.
3) If the speed of a particle is constant, then the angular momentum of the particle about any specific origin must also be constant.
3) if speed is constant then angular momentum = mrv is same since the mass remain the same throughout

No … what is r?
4) Consider a planet moving in a circular orbit about a star. Even if the planet is spinning it is not possible for its total angular momentum to be zero.
4)if an object keeps rotating doesn't it have an initial momentum and final momentum which are same , so, i mean it is constant then.

Yes, it is constant, but you haven't answered the question … can a planet like the Earth (which is both spinning once a day on its own axis and also moving round the Sun once a year) have zero total angular momentum?
5) A particle moving in a straight line with constant speed necessarily has zero angular momentum.
5) particle in straight line can have angular momentum , as in the case of a person jumping of the merry go round with horizontal speed doesnot have zero angular momentum.

Yes, but you should give an answer based on the definition.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top