Angular Momentum of an object with respect to a moving point

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves two particles, A and B, rotating around a fixed point O with constant angular speed. The objective is to determine the angular momentum of particle B with respect to particle A about point O, given their connection through strings of equal length.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss two main approaches to calculate the angular momentum of B with respect to A. One approach involves calculating the angular momentum of both particles with respect to O and then finding their vector difference. The second approach considers the relative motion of B with respect to A, treating A as stationary.

Discussion Status

Some participants question the validity of the first approach, suggesting it may not yield the correct result due to the nature of angular momentum as a vector. Others provide insights into the relationship between angular momentum and relative motion, indicating that the second approach may be more appropriate.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted misconception regarding the treatment of angular momentum vectors similar to position vectors, which is under discussion. Participants are exploring the implications of this misunderstanding on their calculations.

Tanya Sharma
Messages
1,541
Reaction score
135

Homework Statement



Two particles A and B having equal masses m are rotating around a fixed point O with constant angular speed ω .A is connected to point O with a string of length L/2 whereas B is connected to point A with string of length L/2 .Find the angular momentum of B with respect to A about O.

O-------L/2-------A-------L/2--------B

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



There can be two approaches

1.We find angular momentum of B w.r.t O ,say L1 = mω2L.Then we find angular momentum of A w.r.t O ,say L2 = (mω2L)/4.Since angular momentum is a vector , angular momentum of B w.r.t A should be vector difference of L1 and L2 =(3/4)(mω2L)

2.We find relative velocity of B w.r.t A =ωL/2 ,i.e we have considered particle A to be at rest .Then we find shortest distance between point A and line of motion of B which is L/2 .
Now,angular momentum of A w.r.t B =(mω2L)/4

I feel approach 1 is the correct way of calculating angular momentum of a point with respect to a moving point ,but the correct answer is the one given by approach 2.

Which is the right way ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello.

To see that method 1 doesn’t work, consider the case where the equal masses A and B are at the ends and the axis O is in the middle: A----------O----------B. The system revolves about O. Then A and B would have the same angular momentum vector about O. So, if you tried to get the angular momentum of B relative to A by subtracting the angular momenta of A and B about O, you would get zero. But that can’t be correct as B is moving relative to A.

For a general situation, you can see more formally why it doesn’t work by noting that ##\vec{L}_{A/O} =m_A \vec{r}_{A/O} \times\vec{v}_{A/O}##. Similarly for particle B. If you subtract them, you can see that it's not possible in general to reduce it to ##\vec{L}_{B/A} =m_B \vec{r}_{B/A} \times\vec{v}_{B/A}##

The reason you can subtract two velocity vectors to get a relative velocity is because of the relation between the position vectors: ##\vec{r}_{B/A} = \vec{r}_{B/O} - \vec{r}_{A/O}## which holds at each instant of time. Taking the time derivative gives the relative velocity formula.
 
Hello TSny

Thank you very much for the explanation :smile:

So , I guess my misconception stemmed from the fact that I was treating Angular Momentum which is a vector in the same manner as we treat position vectors .ie [itex]\vec{L}_{A/B} =\vec{L}_{A/O}+\vec{L}_{B/O}[/itex] ,which is not the correct way. Instead I should have dealt Angular Momentum of A w.r.t as [itex]\vec{L}_{B/A} =m_B \vec{r}_{B/A} \times\vec{v}_{B/A}[/itex] .

Am I correct in assessing my mistake ?
 
Yes, I think that's right. There's no reason why angular momentum vectors would be related the same as position vectors.
 
TSny...thanks once again
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 71 ·
3
Replies
71
Views
5K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
4K
Replies
18
Views
7K
Replies
67
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K