Another electric field question

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on understanding the calculation of electric field vectors in a problem involving charges arranged in a square. The user initially struggles with why the components in both the x and y directions are multiplied by cos45. Clarifications reveal that breaking down vectors into components is essential for accurate vector addition. The user acknowledges the need to revisit previous material to grasp the concept fully. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the importance of vector analysis in solving electric field problems.
cros0
Messages
4
Reaction score
1

upload_2016-5-21_14-14-31.png

The first part of the above image is the question from the text, and below that is information from the solutions manual. I understand why we broke the components up into the x and y, I understand how we triangulated the distance between the center of our coordinate system and the charge to get a/sqrt(2). What I don't understand why we are multiplying by the cos45 in both x and y. Anyone have any ideas?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi cros0. Please remember to use the formatting template provided in the edit window when you create a homework help request. This is in the PF rules.

Did you sketch in the electric field vectors that each charge produces at the center of the square? What directions do they lie along? How do those directions compare to the implied x and y axes directions?
 
gneill said:
Hi cros0. Please remember to use the formatting template provided in the edit window when you create a homework help request. This is in the PF rules.

Did you sketch in the electric field vectors that each charge produces at the center of the square? What directions do they lie along? How do those directions compare to the implied x and y axes directions?

Hello and thanks for the response. I did not understand that we had to deal with vectors in this problem. I have reviewed the text and I understand now. Finding the magnitude of the vectors of both x and y components is going to require multiplying by cos45 or cos(-45) which will give the same answer. I am going to have to go over the previous chapter again because I think I missed this point.
 
cros0 said:
Hello and thanks for the response. I did not understand that we had to deal with vectors in this problem. I have reviewed the text and I understand now. Finding the magnitude of the vectors of both x and y components is going to require multiplying by cos45 or cos(-45) which will give the same answer. I am going to have to go over the previous chapter again because I think I missed this point.
Yup. You need to break the individual vectors into their components in some assumed coordinate system in order to add together their individual contributions. Essentially this is an exercise in vector addition.
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top