Another Lagrangian question: Bead sliding along a horizontalotating ring

wdednam
Messages
33
Reaction score
1
Another Lagrangian problem: Bead sliding along a horizontal rotating ring

Homework Statement



A horizontal ring of mass M and radius a rotates freely about a vertical axis passing through a point on its circumference. If a bead of mass m slides along the ring without friction, what is the Lagragian function of the bead-ring system? Also write down the Kinetic energy of the bead if the ring rotates at a constant angular velocity \omega about the vertical axis.


Homework Equations



T = \displaystyle{\frac{1}{2}}I\dot{\theta}^2 + \displaystyle{\frac{1}{2}}m\bold{v}^2

L = T - V

I = I_{CM} + MR^2 = 2Ma^2 in this case

\bold{v}^2 = \bold{v_{radial}}^2 + \bold{v_{tangential}}^2

The Attempt at a Solution



Okay, since the motion is horizontal, the gravitational potential energy of the system is constant and the Lagragian function of the system will simply be the kinetic energy of the system: L = T. Now, I can write down an expression for the kinetic energy of the ring (it is simply Ma^2\dot{\theta}^2) and the radial kinetic energy of the bead (\displaystyle{\frac{1}{2}}m\bold{v}^2 = \displaystyle{\frac{1}{2}}m\dot{r}^2 right?), but I don't know what the tangential component of the bead's velocity will look like. Is it simply the algebraic sum of the bead's and ring's tangential velocities? I'd appreciate any help, thanks.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi again,

I found the solution. If you are interested in seeing it, send me a message and I'll give you the link. (I don't think it is within forum rules to post it here)

Thanks to everyone who started thinking about this problem and was going to get back to me later.

Cheers.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top