Answer Fun Torque Problem with 1.9m

  • Thread starter Thread starter jcais
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fun Torque
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a torque problem involving a 3.00 m wooden board weighing 160 N, with one person applying a 60 N upward force. The original poster calculated the position of the second person to be 1.9 m from the end, while a friend arrived at 0.6 m. Another participant pointed out that taking the pivot point at the end where the first force is applied simplifies the calculations, leading to a correct answer of 2.4 m. The importance of correctly accounting for the direction of torques was emphasized, as it affects the final calculations. The conversation highlights the need for clarity in applying torque principles to achieve accurate results.
jcais
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I have a homework problem. I was wondering if you all get/got the same answer that I have: 1.9m. My friend got .6m and I don't know how. I tried working it out twice and still do not come up with .6m.

Here it goes:

2 people are carrying a uniform wooden board that is 3.00 m long and weighs 160 N. if one person applies an upward force of 60 N at one end of the board, where must the other person be standing in order for the board to be in static equilibrium and with what force must they apply?

My answer:
Forces in x direction = 0
Forces in Y = F1 + F2 - W
Given:
L = 3.00 m F1 = 60 N
W = 160 N F2 = ? and x2 = ? This is x sub two.
Sum of forces and torques = 0

Sum Force = F1 + F2 - W = 0
60N + F2 - 160 N = 0
F2 = 100 N
My pivot point is at F2.
Sum of torques = 0
Torque F1 = F1(L - x2)
Torque F2 = 0 b/c at pivot point
Torque W = W(L/2 - x2)
F1L - F1x2 + (WL)/2 - Wx2 = 0
(60)(3) - 60x2 + (160 * 3)/2 - 160x2 = 0
180-60x2 + 240-160x2 = 0
420-220x2 = 0
x2 = 1.9m

Thank you for your assistance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm afraid I got 0.6m also.
 
It is much easier to achieve the 0.6m answer if you take your torques about the opposite end of the board to F1. I also have F2 as 100N

-Hoot:smile:
 
jcais said:
Sum Force = F1 + F2 - W = 0
60N + F2 - 160 N = 0
F2 = 100 N
OK.
My pivot point is at F2.
Sum of torques = 0
Torque F1 = F1(L - x2)
Torque F2 = 0 b/c at pivot point
Torque W = W(L/2 - x2)
OK, but realize that torques have signs: if Torque F1 is clockwise, then Torque W is counter-clockwise.
F1L - F1x2 + (WL)/2 - Wx2 = 0
That's your mistake.

Hint: Try taking the other end (where F1 is) as your pivot point.
 
Dangit! Thank you everyone. :redface:
 
I got 2.4m, which was confirmed as correct. Taking the known force as pivot point is correct but the rest of the algebra you applied was overcomplicated. I just used T_f1 + T_f2 - T_w = 0 with (F * l for each torque) and solved for l in T_f2
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Back
Top