- #176
Vanadium 50
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Education Advisor
- 29,948
- 15,645
their particular boogieman
I think you mean "bogeyman". "Boogieman" is associated with KC and the Sunshine Band. 😉
their particular boogieman
Suggest you get back to me after a glance at Safire's typically workmanlike treatment. http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/editorials/archives/2004/02/01/2003097080I think you mean "bogeyman". "Boogieman" is associated with KC and the Sunshine Band. 😉
Agreed Boogie nights Boogie wonderland = Heat wave / 1970s Earth wind and fire ridiculous clothes. Boo as in twoI think you mean "bogeyman". "Boogieman" is associated with KC and the Sunshine Band. 😉
When will that happen with the Corona virus? Hard to even know the number of cases.Reminds me of a post of mine from a few years back.
Trying to combine my thoughts from then, with this mornings mathematical ruminations, I see that we'll get back to the rates from 100 years ago, in almost exactly 15 years: July 11, 2034
View attachment 246134
I'm guessing the death rates need to get "personal", as in, "not hear say", to get people to act, responsibly.
To act responsibly? Or when will this get "personal"?When will that happen with the Corona virus?
Erm. That time with the H1N1 it was 'interesting' to see the difference between countries. Ukraine got it worst as I recall: once the hospitals got overrun with patients the mortality peaked several times over the 'normal' value....At which point we will each have 1 chance in 35 of dying.
Though, I suspect it won't be quite this grim.
From the graph, it is my guess that some countries didn't bother going to much trouble diagnosing who had it.Erm. That time with the H1N1 it was 'interesting' to see the difference between countries. Ukraine got it worst as I recall: once the hospitals got overrun with patients the mortality peaked several times over the 'normal' value.
No mention there about the amount of actual tests performed and the population per countries: without that it's difficult to take that 'statistics' seriously...From the graph, it is my guess that some countries didn't bother going to much trouble diagnosing who had it.
It was quite an odd pandemic, actually. I think we got off easy that time.ps. It's odd, but I have no recollection of the 2009 pandemic.
If one counts the number of deaths compared to the entire population, the oddballs get lost in the data.No mention there about the amount of actual tests performed and the population per countries: without that it's difficult to take that 'statistics' seriously...
Belarus: 86% dead among the confirmed cases
Guess they made the test only on patients already on intensive care with pneumonia.
It was quite an odd pandemic, actually. I think we got off easy that time.
I had some bouts 'at home' against some anti-vaxers, that's why I have more memories.
I took the chance and added a SIR calculator onAccording to the charts @ wiki, and my always suspicious maths, the entire world will be infected in approximately 35 days: March 2nd, 2020.
At which point we will each have 1 chance in 35 of dying.
Birth is a 100% fatal condition.You mean for the Corona virus? And for now?
##a.a.##Life is a terminal disease.
Almost Always?##a.a.##
Well, there are rumors ...Almost Always?
Unfortunately, the decrease is not equally weighted between the developed and non-developed countries. Ethiopia and Nigeria alone will be adding a total of some 340 million people by 2050 ; 120 and 220 million respective ly, per CIA's world factbook.
Ok. I remember at some point Kenya had a growth rate of around 4.3% growth rate, doubling in less than 17 yrs. Crazy. I think Uganda's is similarly high even now.Yes. Per a woman's lifetime, to be precise.