Astrophysics - Temperature of a star via flux and wavelength

AI Thread Summary
To determine the temperature of a star based on the flux measurements at different wavelengths, Planck's law for blackbody radiation is essential. The equation involves the relationship between flux, frequency, and temperature, where 'e' represents the base of natural logarithms. The user expressed confusion about solving for temperature and incorporating wavelengths, highlighting the need to understand the relationship between frequency and wavelength. Using logarithms is necessary to solve for temperature after applying the appropriate equations. Understanding these concepts is crucial for accurately calculating stellar temperatures.
cwolfx2
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



What is the temperature of a star if the flux at 450 nm is measured to be 1.3 times the flux at 650 nm.

Homework Equations



I tried to use the equation Flux = 2πhv3/c2

ex-1
x= hv/kt

making 2 of the equations equal each other and solve for T. However being out of practice for months now i do not remember what e represents and how to solve for an exponent.

Though I imagine I may have the wrong equation and not sure if i need to or how to incorporate the wavelengths.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
cwolfx2 said:
What is the temperature of a star if the flux at 450 nm is measured to be 1.3 times the flux at 650 nm.

Homework Equations



I tried to use the equation Flux = 2πhv3/c2

ex-1
x= hv/kt

Your spacing wasn't preserved, but if you meant

F(\nu, T) = \frac{2\pi h\nu^3/c^2}{e^{h\nu/kT} - 1}

then yes, this is Planck's law for blackbody radiation.

cwolfx2 said:
making 2 of the equations equal each other and solve for T. However being out of practice for months now i do not remember what e represents and how to solve for an exponent.

'e' is just a number. Granted, it's an irrational number, and it is often used as a base for exponentials because an exponential function with e as a base has certain special properties that are convenient.

In order to solve for x, you have to undo the raising of e to the power of it. In other words, you have to do the inverse operation of taking an exponential. That inverse operation is taking the logarithm to base e, which is also known as the natural logarithm.

cwolfx2 said:
Though I imagine I may have the wrong equation

Modelling the star as an ideal blackbody radiator seems like a reasonable approach.

cwolfx2 said:
and not sure if i need to or how to incorporate the wavelengths.

Of course you need to incorporate them. The Greek symbol 'nu' (\nu) in Planck's law represents frequency. What is the relationship between frequency and wavelength?
 
Apologies for not getting back sooner, I had the wrong email attached to this account. Thanks for the response, I feel silly on some of my oversights such as e (need to look on my calculator more).
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top