Atwood Machine Lab Homework: Solve for Moment of Inertia

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on solving for the moment of inertia (I) in an Atwood machine experiment using the equation (m1 – m2)g = (m1 + m2 + I/R²)a. Participants are trying to validate this equation by plotting the weight difference against acceleration to determine the slope and y-intercept. A non-zero y-intercept is noted, despite the expectation of a zero value, prompting questions about its implications. There is confusion regarding the use of the slope and y-intercept, particularly in relation to the radius and mass of the pulley, which are not provided. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the physics behind the experiment, especially in relation to the acceleration and mass transfer.
Jam51
Messages
32
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I am given the equation (m1 – m2)g = (m1 + m2 + I/R2)a and the experiment is to validate this equation.

Homework Equations




The Attempt at a Solution


After following the lab guide, it tells you to plot the weight difference (m1– m2)g against acceleration and determine the slope and y-intercept.

If my graph is correct, than my equation is: y = 34.3x + 56.409

And from here we are asked to solve for I (moment of inertia of the pulley). It also tells us that the equation predicted a zero y-intercept, however a non-zero is expected. why?

I have no idea what to do with the slope or y-intercept in this situation. I was hoping for the radius of the pulley, but that is not given to us, nor is the mass of the pulley.

Please Help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have t think about what the equations are telling you about the physics ... when a=0, this is a constant speed.
What does the theory tell you needs to happen for a=0, and what does your experiment tell you?
Hint - look at the relationship between m1 and m2.

Did you have the option to measure the dimensions of the pulley?
 
The idea was that you would transfer a dime from one mass to the other to get an increased acceleration from one trial to the next. It accelerates the system twice the weight on the dime faster as its removed from one and placed on the other, so the mass of the system is always constant. Now sure how that relates to the rest... As for the pulley, no I don't have that option as I do not have the lab kit anymore - just going off of data I collected
 
Jam,

I'm working on a similar lab. Did you happen to get a negative value for your moment of inertia?
 
You should not get a negative moment of inertia for the pulley... if you did, then you misplaced a minus sign somewhere.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top