Baryons & addition of angular momentum

AI Thread Summary
In the discussion about baryons and angular momentum, participants explore how to calculate total angular momentum values for a baryon with two quarks in l=0 and one in l=1. The key method involves applying Clebsch-Gordan's theorem to combine the angular momentum states of the quarks, which are spin-1/2 particles. The possible total angular momentum values derived from this approach are 1/2, 3/2, and 5/2. Clarifications are provided regarding the application of the theorem and the reasoning behind the number of terms in the final expression, emphasizing the role of the zero representation in the calculations. Understanding these concepts is crucial for grasping the angular momentum characteristics of baryons.
yxgao
Messages
122
Reaction score
0
I was wondering if someone could help me explain this problem.
In a baryon, two quarks are in l=0 and one quark is in the l=1 state. Quarks are spin-1/2 particles. What values can the total angular momentum take?

I know the answer is 1/2, 3/2, and 5/2, but I'm confused about how they arrive at this answer.

Thx for any help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
yxgao said:
I was wondering if someone could help me explain this problem.
In a baryon, two quarks are in l=0 and one quark is in the l=1 state. Quarks are spin-1/2 particles. What values can the total angular momentum take?
I know the answer is 1/2, 3/2, and 5/2, but I'm confused about how they arrive at this answer.
Thx for any help!

Apply Clebsch-Gordan's theorem for the angular momentum states:
(l=0,s=\frac{1}{2}),(l=0,s=\frac{1}{2}),(l=1,s=\frac{1}{2})

Daniel.
 
That's what the solution said. I don't fully understand the theorem. Is there any way you can explain this better, in context of the problem?
Thanks a lot for help!
 
yxgao said:
That's what the solution said. I don't fully understand the theorem. Is there any way you can explain this better, in context of the problem?
Thanks a lot for help!

Well,it's simple.U have three particles.Each of the paricles has two possible quantum states for the angular momentum.One for the angular,one for the spin.So that means 6 uniparticle states in all.U're interested in composing these 6 values for the angular momentum.So u apply the CG theorem and write:
0\otimes\frac{1}{2}\otimes 0\otimes\frac{1}{2}\otimes 1\otimes\frac{1}{2}
Begin to apply the the theorem from the right.You could do it from the left,as well.
0\otimes\frac{1}{2}\otimes 0\times\frac{1}{2}\otimes(\frac{1}{2}\oplus\frac{3}{2})=0\otimes\frac{1}{2}\otimes 0\otimes (0\oplus 1\oplus 1\oplus 2)=0\otimes\frac{1}{2}\otimes(0\oplus 1\oplus 1\oplus 2)

=0\otimes(\frac{1}{2}\oplus\frac{1}{2}\oplus\frac{3}{2}\oplus\frac{1}{2}\oplus\frac{3}{2}\oplus\frac{3}{2}\oplus\frac{5}{2})

=\frac{1}{2}\oplus\frac{1}{2}\oplus\frac{3}{2}\oplus\frac{1}{2}\oplus\frac{3}{2}\oplus\frac{3}{2}\oplus\frac{5}{2}

Daniel.
 
Thanks for your detailed explanation. How do you go from the last expression in the third to last line to the second to last line? Why do you only have 7 and not 8 terms in the parenthesis?
Thx
 
yxgao said:
Thanks for your detailed explanation. How do you go from the last expression in the third to last line to the second to last line? Why do you only have 7 and not 8 terms in the parenthesis?
Thx

I used the distributivity of the multiplication of representations towards the addition of the representations.The reason why in the last bracket there are 7 instead of 8 terms is that one of the 4 terms in the bracket is '0' and therefore the product of 1/2 with zero is still 1/2.The operator for the irreductible representation of ratio '0' is \hat{1},and so,every operator of the irreductible representation "a" when getting multiplied with the unit operator remains th same.

Daniel.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top