Basic relativity problem - Lorentz Transformations

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a homework problem involving Lorentz transformations to determine the speed required for an observer to perceive two events occurring at the same spatial location. The events are defined with specific coordinates and a time interval, leading to confusion about the correct application of the Lorentz equations. Participants clarify that the speed (V) can be calculated as the distance between the events divided by the time interval, resulting in a value of 2E8 m/s. The conversation highlights that the gamma factor (g) is not necessary for this particular problem, as the observer's speed can be directly derived from the events' parameters. Overall, the thread emphasizes understanding when to apply relativistic concepts and when simpler calculations suffice.
Akhilleus
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Event A occurs at xA = 500m. Event B occurs 5 microseconds later at xB = 1500m. With what speed must an observer move in the positive x direction so that the events occur at the same point in space in the observer's frame?

Homework Equations



Lorentz transformation equations:
x' = g(x - Vt)
t' = g(t - (Vx)/c2)
g = 1/sqrt(1 - V2/c2)

The Attempt at a Solution



I understand conceptually that, as the observer approaches c, the distance between the two events will contract and the time will "slow down", but I'm unsure how to find these values. Is the V value in the above equations simply the distance divided by time when the events are observed at rest? If so, solving for x' leads to a value of 0. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Akhilleus! :smile:

(have a square-root: √ :wink:)
Akhilleus said:
Is the V value in the above equations simply the distance divided by time when the events are observed at rest? If so, solving for x' leads to a value of 0.

v is the speed of one observer relative to the other (the other way round, it's minus v of course).

Explain how you got a value of 0. :confused:

(btw, this problem really has nothing to do with relativity! :biggrin:)
 
Using the distance between the two events divided by the time (5 microseconds) as V:

V = 1000m/(5 E-6)s = 2E8 m/s
g = 1/√(1 - (2E8)2/c2) = 1.8
x' = 1.8(1000m - (2E8)(5E-6)) = 0


So V is the speed of the moving observer as seen by a hypothetical second person at rest. Here, V is just distance between the two events divided by time. Would this be the same V required by the moving observer?
 
Akhilleus said:
So V is the speed of the moving observer as seen by a hypothetical second person at rest. Here, V is just distance between the two events divided by time. Would this be the same V required by the moving observer?

Yes, that's fine. :smile:

What's worrying you about that? :confused:

The question asks you to find a v such that x' = 0 …

that's what you've done! :smile:

(but why are you bothering with gamma? don't you see that you would have got the same result even if you knew no relativity?)
 
Ah, I see. This was a LOT easier than I was making it... haha.

I was caught up on the idea that the distance traveled would contract if he was traveling at 0.6c, and thought that if he didn't slow down, event B would happen behind him. I'm very intrigued by the effects of relativity but I'm still not sure when they apply and when they don't.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top