Blocks connected by rope on slope

AI Thread Summary
A block m1 (10 kg) hangs from a rope over a frictionless pulley connected to block m2 (5 kg) on a 40-degree slope. The tension in the rope and the acceleration of both blocks are the same, leading to the equations m1 * a = -m1 * g + T and m2 * a = -m2 * g sin(40) + T. The derived acceleration is a = (m2 * g sin(40) - m1 * g) / (m1 - m2), resulting in a value of -13.3 m/s², which raises questions about the sign convention used. It is clarified that if m1 accelerates downward, m2 must accelerate upward, and adjusting the sign convention can resolve the confusion. The discussion emphasizes the importance of consistent sign conventions in solving such problems.
superdave
Messages
149
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement



I just want to confirm this.

A block m1=10 kg is hanging from a rope. the rope is attached by a frictionless pulley to a block m2=5 kg on a frictionless slope with a 40 degree angle from the ground.

Find the tension in the rope and the acceleration of the first block.

Homework Equations



So the tension is the same for both blocks, and so is the acceleration.

m1 * a=-m1 * g + T
m2 * a=-m2 *g sin(40) + T

The Attempt at a Solution



T = m1 * a + m1 * g
T= m2 * a + m2 *g sin(40)

m1 * a + m1 * g = m2 * a + m2 *g sin(40)
(m1 - m2) * a = m2 *g sin(40) - m1 * g

a = (m2 *g sin(40) - m1 * g) / (m1 - m2)
a = -13.3 m/s2

I'm not sure about the negative. Because I set up the problem so - for the first block is down and + is up. and - for the second block is downslope and + is upslope. But if a is the same for both blocks, then it doesn't make sense.

But did I do everything right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If the acceleration of m1 is down, then the acceleration of m2 must be up. Fix your equations accordingly. (With your sign convention, you can't call both accelerations 'a'.)
 
So would I do a1 and a2 with a1 = - a2 ?

Or do I have to do all the equations over again?
 
superdave said:
So would I do a1 and a2 with a1 = - a2 ?
That should work.

Or do I have to do all the equations over again?
Nope.

The trick I like to use is to guess the most likely direction and call it positive. Here I'd guess that m1 goes down, so I'd say that the acceleration of m1 was 'a' downward. And thus the acceleration of m2 is fixed to be 'a' up the incline. If you guess right, 'a' will turn out to be positive; if you guessed wrong, it will be negative. No worries.
 
Okay, thanks
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top