Broglie wavelength - calculate electric potential difference

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the electric potential difference for electrons in a TV tube, given their wavelength of 1.0 x 10^{-11} m. The initial calculations for velocity and potential difference are presented, but there are errors in the kinetic energy calculation and unit consistency. Participants highlight the importance of using the correct formula for kinetic energy, specifically noting the need to square the velocity. Additionally, the speed of the electrons approaches relativistic effects, although the non-relativistic calculation remains accurate within a small margin of error. Clarifications on unit conversions and formula application are emphasized to ensure correct results.
pbonnie
Messages
92
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


In a TV tube, an electric potential difference accelerates electrons from a rest position towards a screen. Just before striking the screen, the electrons have a wavelength of 1.0 x 10^{-11} m. Find the electric potential difference.

Homework Equations


λ = h/mv
ΔE_k = qΔV

The Attempt at a Solution


v = h/λm = (6.63x10^{-34}Js)/(1.0x10^{-11}m)(9.11x10^{-31})
= 7.3 x 10^7 m/s
I rearranged the second equation to solve for ΔV
ΔV = ((1/2)(9.11x10^{-31}kg)(7.3x10^7m/s))/(1.60 x 10^-19c)
= 2.1 x 10^{-4} V

I was just wondering if someone could let me know if I'm doing this right? Sorry for not using latex properly, I'm not really sure how to make fractions.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello.

Your method looks good. But you need to check your calculation of the kinetic energy of the electron.
 
Units

Another good way to see that your calculation went awry is to check your units instead of just writing Volts as the units for the answer.

kg*(m/s)/C are the units on your product in the final line of your calculation before the answer. But Volts are J/C

We know that a Joule is not a kg*m/s, but should be a kg*m2/s2.

Hope this helps.

Dr Peter Vaughan
BASIS Peoria Physics
 
Ah thank you both very much. I wrote down the 1/2mv^2 in my actual work but forgot to do the calculation.

Thank you:)
 
Good work!

Note that you got a speed of the electron that is about 24% the speed of light. This is encroaching on the domain of relativity. But your non-relativistic answer is accurate to within 2% error.
 
Last edited:
i think for the Ek formula should be 1/2mv^2 and seems you missed the to square the 7.3E7m/s
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...

Similar threads

Back
Top