Calculate binding energy & compare to Electrostatic Repulsion

ZedCar
Messages
353
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



4He2 has size of ~ 2 x 10^-15 m and a mass of 4.0015u. Calculate the binding energy of this nucleus, and compare it to the electrostatic repulsion of its constituents.





Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



For the first part I have calculated B.E. = 4.5 x 10^-12 J This agrees with my notes.

For the second part do I use the equation E = (q1 x q2) / [4∏(ε0)r^2]

Which would be;

(1.6 x 10^-19)^2 / [4∏ x 8.85 x 10^-12 x (1 x 10^-15)^2]

= 230 J

The reason I ask is because in the notes I have the r = 1 x 10^-15 value is not squared in the same calculation therefore giving an answer of 2.3 x 10^-13 J.

So I wasn't sure which is correct. Thanks for any advice!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ZedCar said:

Homework Statement



4He2 has size of ~ 2 x 10^-15 m and a mass of 4.0015u. Calculate the binding energy of this nucleus, and compare it to the electrostatic repulsion of its constituents.





Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



For the first part I have calculated B.E. = 4.5 x 10^-12 J This agrees with my notes.

For the second part do I use the equation E = (q1 x q2) / [4∏(ε0)r^2]
Something is not right with that. If E is supposed to represent energy, you have a extra r in the equation. If E is supposed to represent electric field, you have an extra q in the equation. If the right side of the equation is correct, the left hand side is a measure of force.
Which would be;

(1.6 x 10^-19)^2 / [4∏ x 8.85 x 10^-12 x (1 x 10^-15)^2]

= 230 J
Okay, if you are trying to calculate energy, you haven't used the correct formula (see above).
The reason I ask is because in the notes I have the r = 1 x 10^-15 value is not squared in the same calculation therefore giving an answer of 2.3 x 10^-13 J.
There are different formulas for force and energy. (see below)
So I wasn't sure which is correct. Thanks for any advice!
The force magnitude between two charges is

F = \frac{1}{4 \pi \varepsilon_0} \frac{q_1 q_2}{r^2}

The units are of course units of force such as Newtons (not Joules).

Invoking the definition of work, dW = \vec F \cdot \vec{ds} (in part), we can calculate the electric potential energy. The electric potential energy is the energy that it takes for one charge brought from infinity to some radius, r away from some other charge. (I'll call this energy W):

W = -\int_{-\infty}^r \frac{1}{4 \pi \varepsilon_0} \frac{q_1 q_2}{r^{'2}} dr^' = \frac{1}{4 \pi \varepsilon_0} \frac{q_1 q_2}{r}

Note that the r in the denominator is not squared after the integration. W here has units of energy, such as joules.

So is the problem statement asking for electrostatic energy or force?
 
collinsmark said:
So is the problem statement asking for electrostatic energy or force?

Thanks very much collinsmark.

The units of the answer given in my notes has units of Joules. So the question would appear to be asking for electrostatic energy.

So the equation they have used appears to be correct.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top