Calculate Quality of Mixture at 5000 kPa, 0.03181 m^3/kg

  • Thread starter Thread starter t3rom
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mixture Quality
t3rom
Messages
54
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



If you have a mixture of saturated water vapor and saturated liquid water at a pressure of 5000 kPa, and you measure its specific volume to be 0.03181 m^3/kg, what is the quality of the mixture?


Homework Equations



Nothing is given :(

From lectures I found vtot = (1-x)vf+xvg


The Attempt at a Solution



From the saturation table for steam, for 50 bar (or 5000kPa) the values of vf and vg are 1.286 and 0.039, respectively.

I'm supposing the specific volume in the problem is vtot= 0.03181

x=vtot-vf/vg-vf = 1.00 which is wrong as p the choices. I'll appreciate if someone can point out what I'm doing wrong, and help me solve this problem. Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It looks like you solved for x incorrectly. Recheck your algebra.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Actually it's correct but the value of vf was supposed to be 0.01286, which was causing the mistake. Thanks for your help Chestermiller :)
 
t3rom said:
Actually it's correct but the value of vf was supposed to be 0.01286, which was causing the mistake. Thanks for your help Chestermiller :)

What I meant was that there were parenthesis missing.

Chet
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top