Calculate the best angle for maximum light dispersion through a medium

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the optimal angle for maximum light dispersion through a medium, specifically using the critical angle formula. The critical angle is defined by the equation ##\theta _1>\ sin ^{-1} \left( \frac {n_2} {n_1} \right)##, where ##n_2 = 1##. The user differentiates the critical angle with respect to the wavelength ##\lambda##, leading to the expression $$\frac {d θ_1} {d \lambda} = -\frac{\frac{d}{{d \lambda}} n_1(\lambda)}{n_1(\lambda) \sqrt{n_1(\lambda)^2-1}}$$. The conclusion suggests that setting the derivative to zero will yield the wavelength for maximum angle, indicating a solid understanding of the relationship between wavelength and critical angle.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of critical angle and total internal reflection
  • Familiarity with differentiation in calculus
  • Knowledge of refractive indices and their dependency on wavelength
  • Basic grasp of light dispersion principles
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the implications of varying refractive indices on light behavior
  • Study the application of Snell's Law in different mediums
  • Learn about the relationship between wavelength and refractive index in materials
  • Investigate advanced topics in optics, such as photonic crystals
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, optical engineers, and students studying optics who are interested in understanding light behavior in various mediums and optimizing light dispersion techniques.

Jan Berkhout
Messages
8
Reaction score
3
Homework Statement
If you have light moving from ##n_1## to ##n_2## you can get dispersion if ##n_1## is a function of wavelength.
What angle of incidence ##(θ_1)## will maximise the dispersion for the situation below where the light goes from a medium with ##n_1(λ)## to vacuum, ##(n_2 = 1)##?
Relevant Equations
$$\frac{d \sin ^{-1}(\text{ax})}{\text{dx}}=\frac{a}{\sqrt{1-(ax)^2}}$$ $$\frac {dy}{dx}=\frac{dy}{dz} \frac{dz}{dx}$$
I first thought that the angle would have to be maximum when it is closest to the critical angle for total internal reflection. From my lectures the equation for the critical angle is ##\theta _1>\ sin ^{-1} \left( \frac {n_2} {n_1} \right),## so as ##n_2 = 1##, we have ##\theta _1=\sin ^{-1}\left(\frac{1}{n_1(\lambda)}\right)##. I didn't really know what to do after that but from the equations given in the hint (relevant equations), I thought I'd have to differentiate with respect to ##\lambda##. This gives $$\frac {d θ_1} {d \lambda} = -\frac{\frac{d}{{d \lambda}} n_1(\lambda)}{n_1(\lambda) \sqrt{n_1(\lambda)^2-1}}.$$ So I have the change in the critical angle with respect to the change in wavelength, so my hunch is I have to set the derivative to 0 and solve for \lambda to find the wavelength for the maximum angle then I can calculate the angle? Is this right?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I worked hard and actually believe I have solved it! So this thread can be closed :)
 
Jan Berkhout said:
This gives $$\frac {d θ_1} {d \lambda} = -\frac{\frac{d}{{d \lambda}} n_1(\lambda)}{n_1(\lambda) \sqrt{n_1(\lambda)^2-1}}.$$
Don't you want to maximise ##\lambda## wrt ##\theta_1##? For that you need $$\frac {d \lambda} {d θ_1}$$.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
689
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
46
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
26
Views
6K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K