Calculate the best angle for maximum light dispersion through a medium

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the optimal angle for maximum light dispersion through a medium, initially considering the critical angle for total internal reflection. The critical angle equation is derived, leading to the differentiation of the angle with respect to wavelength. The participant proposes setting the derivative to zero to find the wavelength that maximizes the angle. Another contributor suggests that maximizing wavelength concerning the angle requires a different approach, specifically calculating the derivative of wavelength with respect to the angle. The conversation highlights the complexity of the relationship between angle and wavelength in light dispersion.
Jan Berkhout
Messages
8
Reaction score
3
Homework Statement
If you have light moving from ##n_1## to ##n_2## you can get dispersion if ##n_1## is a function of wavelength.
What angle of incidence ##(θ_1)## will maximise the dispersion for the situation below where the light goes from a medium with ##n_1(λ)## to vacuum, ##(n_2 = 1)##?
Relevant Equations
$$\frac{d \sin ^{-1}(\text{ax})}{\text{dx}}=\frac{a}{\sqrt{1-(ax)^2}}$$ $$\frac {dy}{dx}=\frac{dy}{dz} \frac{dz}{dx}$$
I first thought that the angle would have to be maximum when it is closest to the critical angle for total internal reflection. From my lectures the equation for the critical angle is ##\theta _1>\ sin ^{-1} \left( \frac {n_2} {n_1} \right),## so as ##n_2 = 1##, we have ##\theta _1=\sin ^{-1}\left(\frac{1}{n_1(\lambda)}\right)##. I didn't really know what to do after that but from the equations given in the hint (relevant equations), I thought I'd have to differentiate with respect to ##\lambda##. This gives $$\frac {d θ_1} {d \lambda} = -\frac{\frac{d}{{d \lambda}} n_1(\lambda)}{n_1(\lambda) \sqrt{n_1(\lambda)^2-1}}.$$ So I have the change in the critical angle with respect to the change in wavelength, so my hunch is I have to set the derivative to 0 and solve for \lambda to find the wavelength for the maximum angle then I can calculate the angle? Is this right?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I worked hard and actually believe I have solved it! So this thread can be closed :)
 
Jan Berkhout said:
This gives $$\frac {d θ_1} {d \lambda} = -\frac{\frac{d}{{d \lambda}} n_1(\lambda)}{n_1(\lambda) \sqrt{n_1(\lambda)^2-1}}.$$
Don't you want to maximise ##\lambda## wrt ##\theta_1##? For that you need $$\frac {d \lambda} {d θ_1}$$.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top