Calculating Acceleration of a Skier on an Inclined Slope

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mirole
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Slope
AI Thread Summary
The skier's acceleration down a 15-degree slope is calculated using the net force equation, factoring in gravitational forces and friction. The initial calculation mistakenly added the friction force instead of subtracting it, leading to an incorrect acceleration value. After correcting the error, the revised acceleration is determined to be 1.97 m/s². The direction of the acceleration is down the slope, aligned with the gravitational component acting along the incline. Accurate calculations are crucial for understanding motion on inclined planes.
Mirole
Messages
33
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


You, a 75-kg skier, glide straight down a snow-covered slope inclined at 15 degrees to the horizontal over spring break. Let's be realistic, what is your acceleration(magnitude and direction) Assume your skis are wood and the snow is dry. mu_k on snow is 0.060.


Homework Equations


Fnet=ma


The Attempt at a Solution


Fx = -fk+mgsin\theta = ma
Fy = n = mgcos\theta

-mu_k*mgcos\theta = ma - mgsin\theta
a = -mu_k*g*cos\theta + gsin\theta
a = (.060)(9.8)cos15 + 9.8sin15
a = 8.22 m/s2

Did I do the first part right? And, how would I find the direction?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
a = -mu_k*g*cosθ + gsinθ
a = (.060)(9.8)cos15 + 9.8sin15
Looks like you dropped a minus sign in that step.
The friction force opposes the parallel component of gravity, so there ought to be subtraction rather than addition.
 
Wow, I did that by mistake and didn't even catch it. Thanks, so would 1.97m/s2 be correct?
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top