Calculating Charge on 10cm Diameter Sphere: 3700V

  • Thread starter Thread starter FuzzyDunlop
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Charge Sphere
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion revolves around calculating the charge on a conducting sphere with a diameter of 10 centimeters and a measured voltage of 3700 V. The formula used is V = kq/R, where k is Coulomb's constant (8.987 x 10^9 N m²/C²) and R is the radius of the sphere. The correct calculation reveals that the charge (q) is approximately 0.041 microcoulombs (μC). The confusion arose from the user initially miscalculating the radius, which is 0.05 meters, not 0.1 meters.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electrostatics and Coulomb's law
  • Familiarity with the concept of voltage and charge
  • Knowledge of unit conversions, particularly between coulombs and microcoulombs
  • Basic algebra for solving equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the principles of electrostatics, focusing on Coulomb's law
  • Learn about the relationship between voltage, charge, and radius in spherical conductors
  • Practice unit conversions, especially from coulombs to microcoulombs
  • Explore common mistakes in electrostatics calculations and how to avoid them
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on electrostatics, as well as educators looking for examples of common calculation errors in voltage and charge relationships.

FuzzyDunlop
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


the question is A conducting sphere has a diameter of 10 centimeters. If you measure its voltage to be 3700 V, what is the charge in μC you have put on the sphere?


Homework Equations



V=3700, D=0.1 m, V=kq/R

The Attempt at a Solution



3700= (8.987 * 10^9 * q)/.1

q=.041 microcoloumbs.

but it says I am wrong?? am i making a mistake someplace?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What's the radius?
 
LowlyPion said:
What's the radius?

oh my god I am stupid. thanks
 
FuzzyDunlop said:
oh my god I am stupid. thanks

Careless ... maybe, but I suspect you will get over that.

Stupid? Not likely. You were smart enough to ask here.
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K