Calculating Force on an Electron Projected Towards a Charged Conducting Plate

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves calculating the force on an electron projected towards a uniformly charged flat conducting plate, considering its initial velocity and the distance traveled before striking the plate.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the electric field generated by the conducting plate and the force acting on the electron. There are attempts to derive the surface charge density based on the motion of the electron and its interaction with the electric field.

Discussion Status

Some participants provide feedback on the calculations presented, with one suggesting a potential error in dimensionality of the given answer. Multiple interpretations of the problem are being explored, but no consensus has been reached regarding the correctness of the initial attempts.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of dimensionality concerns regarding the provided answer, indicating a possible misunderstanding or miscalculation in the problem setup.

Tanya Sharma
Messages
1,541
Reaction score
135

Homework Statement



An electron is projected from a distance d and with initial velocity u parallel to a uniformly charged flat conducting plate as shown. It strikes the plate after traveling a distance l along the direction of projection. The surface charge density of the conducting plate is equal to

Ans :dε0mu2/el

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Electric field of the conducting plate = σ/ε0

Force on the electron in y direction = eσ/ε0

ay = eσ/mε0

l=ut and d=(1/2)ayt2

Solving these ,I get σ = 2dε0mu2/el2 ,but this is incorrect.

I would be grateful if somebody could help me with the problem.
 

Attachments

  • charge.GIF
    charge.GIF
    740 bytes · Views: 578
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Tania,
It looks correct for me, but do not forget the parentheses.

ehild
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Hello ehild

Thank you very much :)
 
Note that the given answer must be wrong since it has the wrong dimensionality.
 
Okay . Thanks for the input .
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K