Calculating Ground State Energy for Triple Ionized Beryllium

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the ground state energy of triple ionized beryllium (Z=4), the correct approach uses the formula -Z²(13.6 eV)/n², where n=1 for the ground state. The user initially miscalculated by assuming n=3, leading to an incorrect result. The discussion highlights that the triple ionization means the atom has a +4e core with one electron in orbit, making the Bohr model applicable but limited due to high Z and electron interactions. Ultimately, the correct application of the formula yields the accurate ground state energy for the system.
PeterWarrick9
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Calculate the energy of the electron in the ground state of triple ionized beryllium, which has an atomic number Z = 4.


Homework Equations



-Z2 (13.6)
N2

The Attempt at a Solution




Z=4 as given and it is tripled so our N=3. We throw our numbers in there and we should have -(16)(13.6). Take that product and divide it by 9. I got an answer of -24.18, but I am incorrect.

Unfortunately, I do not have my textbook with me right now so I might have the equation all wrong. I would really appreciate it if someone could give me a hint or a good website to learn from.

THANK YOU!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
\frac{m_e Z^2 e^4}{(4 \pi \epsilon_0)^2 2 \hbar^2}\frac{1}{n^2}
 
Z=4 is correct, however the electron is in the ground state, so n=1.
The triple ionized means that the normally neutrally charged beryllium atom now has a +3e charge, so the situation is idealized to a +4e core (Z=4) with just one -1e electron in it's orbit, obviously being in the ground state (n=1).
This is because the equation you gave doesn't hold for high Z, high N and disregards electron-electron interaction, since the Bohr model (the equation is an extrapolated result of the Bohr model of the hydrogen atom) doesn't properly account for these kind of interactions.
I'm not completing the calculation because I don't feel like it, but I'm fairly positive that you'll arrive at the correct answer.
 
Sjorris, I would just like to THANK YOU! I succesfully solved my problem because of your help.

I really appreciate your help.

THANKS! again

Happy Holidays
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top