Calculating Ground State Energy for Triple Ionized Beryllium

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the ground state energy of triple ionized beryllium (Z=4), the correct approach uses the formula -Z²(13.6 eV)/n², where n=1 for the ground state. The user initially miscalculated by assuming n=3, leading to an incorrect result. The discussion highlights that the triple ionization means the atom has a +4e core with one electron in orbit, making the Bohr model applicable but limited due to high Z and electron interactions. Ultimately, the correct application of the formula yields the accurate ground state energy for the system.
PeterWarrick9
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Calculate the energy of the electron in the ground state of triple ionized beryllium, which has an atomic number Z = 4.


Homework Equations



-Z2 (13.6)
N2

The Attempt at a Solution




Z=4 as given and it is tripled so our N=3. We throw our numbers in there and we should have -(16)(13.6). Take that product and divide it by 9. I got an answer of -24.18, but I am incorrect.

Unfortunately, I do not have my textbook with me right now so I might have the equation all wrong. I would really appreciate it if someone could give me a hint or a good website to learn from.

THANK YOU!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
\frac{m_e Z^2 e^4}{(4 \pi \epsilon_0)^2 2 \hbar^2}\frac{1}{n^2}
 
Z=4 is correct, however the electron is in the ground state, so n=1.
The triple ionized means that the normally neutrally charged beryllium atom now has a +3e charge, so the situation is idealized to a +4e core (Z=4) with just one -1e electron in it's orbit, obviously being in the ground state (n=1).
This is because the equation you gave doesn't hold for high Z, high N and disregards electron-electron interaction, since the Bohr model (the equation is an extrapolated result of the Bohr model of the hydrogen atom) doesn't properly account for these kind of interactions.
I'm not completing the calculation because I don't feel like it, but I'm fairly positive that you'll arrive at the correct answer.
 
Sjorris, I would just like to THANK YOU! I succesfully solved my problem because of your help.

I really appreciate your help.

THANKS! again

Happy Holidays
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top