Calculating Image Position and Height Using Two Lenses?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the image position and height using two lenses with given focal lengths and object distances. The first lens produces an image at 20 cm, while the second lens, positioned 30 cm from the first, yields an image at -30 cm with a height of 6 cm. There is confusion regarding the ray diagram's accuracy compared to the calculations derived from the thin lens formula. Participants emphasize the importance of constructing a ray diagram to visualize the image formation accurately. Ultimately, the calculations and ray tracing should align for a clear understanding of the image's position and characteristics.
CalebtheCoward
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A 2 cm tall object is 20 cm to the left of a lens with a focal length of 10 cm. A second lens with a focal length of 15 cm is 30 cm to the right of the first lens. Calculate the image position and height. Compare with ray-tracing.

Homework Equations


1/f = 1/do + 1/di, m = -di/do and hi/ho; f: focal point, do: object distance, di: image distance, hi: image height, ho: object height.

The Attempt at a Solution


1/dia = 1/10 - 1/20, dia=20 cm; 1/dib = 1/15 - 1/(-dia+30), dib=-30 cm. (a denotes first lens, b second).
And this is where I stumble. Looking in the back of the book, the correct answer seems to be: dib=30 cm, hib=6.0 cm. Doing the previous problems, the measurements are relative from the second lens, and after comparing the result with my ray diagram 30 cm, or -30 cm for that matter, is no where near my second image convergence point.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You seem to be right. The second lens form the image at -30cm with a magnification of x3. So the image formed by the 2nd lens will be inverted and 6cm high.
 
Have you tried making a ray diagram?
 
No, these are just from the thin lens formula. Do you have a problem with constructing the diagram?
 
I must be, because when I construct the diagram, the location of the second image is neither 30 cm in front of or behind the second lens, which doesn't lend our answer much levity.
 
ray diagram

The image op the tip of the arrow, p, will seem to be located at p' if you extend the rays backwards.
That is if one looks to the left through the lens the rays seem to originate from the point p'.
 

Attachments

  • Like
Likes 1 person
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top