Calculating magnetic flux density using Biot-Savart law.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating magnetic flux density using the Biot-Savart law, with participants questioning the original poster's approach. Key concerns include the definition and relevance of variables like "r" and "z" in a problem set in the x/y plane, as well as the integration limits from -a to a. Participants emphasize the need to correctly account for components of vectors dl and R, noting that both should lie in the x-y plane. There is also a suggestion to multiply the final result by three to account for multiple wires, indicating that several aspects of the calculations require correction. Overall, the thread highlights the complexities involved in applying the Biot-Savart law accurately in this context.
3OPAH
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Hello, all. I have been working on the following problem and was wondering if someone could check my work and provide some valuable input:
hJAsGCN.png

Here is my work:
ajT4OsT.jpg


What do you guys think about my approach to this problem?

 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is r, why do you consider z if everything happens in the x/y plane? Where does the expression for ##\vec{R}## come from?
In particular, how can your result depend on "r" which does not appear in the problem statement? The direction of the answer does not seem to make sense - how can something at the origin point in the direction of an angle?

Did you try to use cylindrical coordinates? I don't think that helps.

I don't understand why you integrate from -a to a.

I think you forgot to multiply the final result by 3 for the three wires, but there are several other things to fix first.
 
mfb said:
What is r, why do you consider z if everything happens in the x/y plane? Where does the expression for ##\vec{R}## come from?
In particular, how can your result depend on "r" which does not appear in the problem statement? The direction of the answer does not seem to make sense - how can something at the origin point in the direction of an angle?

Did you try to use cylindrical coordinates? I don't think that helps.

I don't understand why you integrate from -a to a.

I think you forgot to multiply the final result by 3 for the three wires, but there are several other things to fix first.
You are correct. Neither dl nor R should have components along ez. Since the triangle lies in the x-y plane (z=0), dl should have components along ex and ey. Also, R should only have components along ex and ey because it's pointing from the location of dl , which is in the x-y plane, to the origin, which is also in the x-y plane. Accordingly, the cross product dl x R would come out to be along ez, which is what we should expect from the right hand rule.

I am having a hard time computing dl and R. When I find dl and R it's a simple substitution into dB from there. Could you show me how you would calculate dl and R ?
 
Did you find the coordinates of the three corners? dl will be along one of the edges - there is an easy one and two more complicated edges. R follows from the choice of the edge. Note that it varies along the length of the wire.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top