Calculating Specific Heat: 86.6°C to 21.3°C

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the specific heat of the alloy, apply the principle of energy conservation, assuming an adiabatic system where the heat lost by the alloy equals the heat gained by the water. The water's temperature change is from 19.6°C to 21.3°C, resulting in a temperature change (ΔT) of 1.7°C. The heat gained by the water can be calculated using the formula Qw = mw * cw * ΔT, where mw is the mass of the water and cw is its specific heat capacity. The specific heat of the alloy can then be determined by rearranging the formula c = q/ΔT, where q is the heat lost by the alloy. This approach allows for the calculation of the specific heat capacity of the alloy based on the known values.
Jurrasic
Messages
98
Reaction score
0
was heated to 86.6 C and then placed in a calorimeter that contained 61.2 grams of water at 19.6 C
The temp of the water rose to 21.3 , determine the specific heat of the alloy in J/gC "

Technique:
use the formula
c= q/delta t

what do you plug in for q ?
you would have
c = q/1.7 ?
what do you get if you know what to plug in for q ?

ok well it seems like you could also average the two temperatures of the water and that could give you a value, would that value be your heat transferred or your delta T
and then the alloy at 88.6 degrees C would be another value to be plugged in, where could you plug it into as q ? ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Think about using an energy balance here. Assuming that the system is adiabatic, the energy lost by the metal should be the same as the energy gained by the water. Furthermore, you know the mass of the water, its temperature change and its specific heat capacity (look it up, it is commonly available data), so you can easily calculate how much energy the water gained:

Q_{w} = m_wc_w\Delta T

If the metal loses this same amount of energy and you know much much its temperature changed by, what must its specific heat capacity be?
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top