Can Exceeding the Speed of Light Reverse Time?

In summary: It's actually the distance between their centers PLUS the velocity vector's magnitude (i.e. 1.2c).In summary, the two bodies are travelling at different speeds, and the addition of their speeds results in a larger distance being covered.
  • #1
Gamish
108
0
Here are a few questions that I have built up. If someone knows the awsner to some of them, I would greatly appreteate your help.

1.If a "body" were to exceed c, then time would go in reverse for that body of motion, not time around them, right? For instance, let A travel faster than c, relevant to stationary observer B. Time for A would go in reverse, with respect to B then. I don't call this Time Travel to the past, unless I am incorrect. "If this were possible, one could be young forever, not bad :-p "

2.Can an "internal" body of motion exceed c, with respect to the motion of a larger body that it lies within. For instance, let's say that the world's rotation, the the movement of our solar system, and the movement of the milky way added up to .6c. Then if we were to also reach .6c on earth, that would be 1.20c relevant to a stationary observer within the universe. Will the fabric of space-time allow such internal motion of exceed c?

4.If we were traveling at .99c, then time would significant decrease for us, but what if that craft we were traveling in generated a high gravitational fled, in which it warped space-time. So time would run slow because of the velocity near c, and the gravitational fled, and if I'm correct, this is a negative number. Would this allow time travel to the past?

5.The photon has no rest mass, yet, by means of it's own speed, it contains kinetic energy. If I'm correct, kinetic energy has mass, this means that something with mass is traveling at c. If this is indeed true, can the "photon" also carry matter, not just energy? And if it did, it should be hypothetically possible to reach c.

6.This question concerning time dilation and length contraction, in which I'm confused. If one reaches .6c, time and length will decrease by about 40% for a stationary observer, but will time and length LITERALLY decrease for the mover? For instance, I'm going .6c, time slows down by 40%, does time literally go slow for me, but I don't perceive it because even my brain waves are slow? Or does time LITERALLY run normal for me, but time runs fast around me? I'm just a little confused here. Because as I understand, the warping of time occurs only by the density of space IE if space is thick, time runs slower.

Thanks in advance :smile:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Here are some general facts that may help you answer your questions.

1. Time does not slow down for anybody.

Belief to the contrary stems from the fact of time dilation naively blended with the Newtonian depiction of space-time.

What is true is that if we're moving (inertially) relative to each other, then I will observe my clock ticking faster than your clock.

However, you will also see your clock ticking faster than my clock.


If we're not moving inertially, things get more complicated, but can still be calculated through calculus and/or geometry.


The misconception stems from treating time as its own dimension, rather than part of a four dimensional space-time. We are already familiar with analogous examples of motion through space.


For example, suppose you and I start at the same place, and I plan to stroll north and you plan to stroll northeast.

After taking 100 steps, I pause and turn east to look at the point on your path, and see that it would take you 141 steps to reach that point.

However, after taking 100 steps, you pause and turn northwest to look at the point on my path, and you would see that it would take me 141 steps to reach that point.


Each of us finds that the other takes 41% more steps to cover the same distance because we're measuring in different directions -- I'm measuring northerly travel and you're measuring northeasterly travel.

Geometrically speaking, time dilation is exactly analogous to this; two observers in relative motion measure "coordinate time" along different directions in space-time, and thus see each other's clocks running at different rates. And as in this spatial example, it is still consistent for each of us to observe each other's clocks running slowly.



2. 0.6c + 0.6c = 1.2c

This is yet another holdover from the older notion that space and time are "separate". However, as in the previous section, things change once you accept a unified space-time. Here, the resolution is that these two relative velocity vectors don't point in the same direction. Thus, when you add them, their net length is not simply the sum of the individual lengths. The geometry of SR is such that adding vectors with lengths less than c will always yield another vector with length less than c.



3. Gravitational time dilation vs relativistic time dilation

Things like "time dilation" become less well defined once you step into GR -- talking about such things requires one to impose the idea of "coordinates" onto space-time, and in general, coordinates don't need to act much like you expect them to.


Anyways, in nice, weak cases (such as looking at Earth's gravitational field), one can get an (extremely good) approximation by imposing coordinates that act similarly to the way coordinates are "supposed" to act. When you do that, one can then define time dilation, and see that it factors into two pieces, one that depends on gravitational potential energy (e.g. this is what is typically thought as "gravitational time dilation"), and one that depends on relative velocity (the stuff from SR).

In any case, in this coordinate system, coordinate time never runs backwards for anything. :-p



4. Energy doesn't have mass.

You're probably thinking of K = 1/2 m v^2 (which doesn't apply to relativistic speeds), or E = m c^2 (which is a formula for converting rest mass to energy, not stating the mass possessed by energy).
 
  • #3
Thanks for your help on that. I always said "I just don't see how time is a 4th demention". I now know why it is. I used to think time was the effects of motion through space. thanks again :)
 

Related to Can Exceeding the Speed of Light Reverse Time?

1. What is the theory of relativity?

The theory of relativity is a fundamental concept in physics that was developed by Albert Einstein. It states that the laws of physics are the same for all observers, regardless of their relative motion. There are two main theories of relativity: special relativity, which deals with objects moving at constant speeds, and general relativity, which explains the effects of gravity on objects in motion.

2. How does relativity impact our daily lives?

Although the effects of relativity may not be immediately noticeable in our daily lives, it has played a crucial role in shaping our understanding of the universe. It has led to advancements in technology, such as GPS systems, and has provided a deeper understanding of concepts like time dilation and the curvature of spacetime.

3. What is the difference between special and general relativity?

Special relativity deals with the laws of physics in the absence of gravity, while general relativity takes into account the effects of gravity. Special relativity also considers objects in motion at constant speeds, while general relativity explains the effects of acceleration and gravitational fields on objects in motion.

4. Is the theory of relativity proven?

The theory of relativity has been extensively tested and confirmed by numerous experiments and observations. However, it is still considered a theory because it has not been proven to be the absolute and final truth. Scientists continue to study and test the theory to further refine and expand our understanding of the universe.

5. Can you provide an example of relativity in action?

One example of relativity in action is the phenomenon of time dilation. According to special relativity, time moves slower for objects in motion compared to stationary objects. This has been confirmed through experiments, such as the famous Hafele-Keating experiment, where atomic clocks on airplanes were found to have a slightly slower time compared to identical clocks on the ground.

Similar threads

  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
34
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
65
Views
5K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
51
Views
3K
  • Special and General Relativity
4
Replies
125
Views
5K
Replies
38
Views
3K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
8
Views
918
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
43
Views
2K
Back
Top