Can You Derive Equations Using UAM Principles?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jensgt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    deriving
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around deriving equations 5-1 and 5-2 using Uniformly Accelerated Motion (UAM) principles. A participant expresses uncertainty about how to begin, mentioning attempts with range and height equations without success. Others suggest focusing on standard constant acceleration equations for both x and y directions, emphasizing the importance of using the correct variables. They encourage sharing progress and remind to avoid confusing notation. The conversation highlights the collaborative effort to understand and apply UAM concepts in physics.
jensgt
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Can you come up with (i.e. derive) equations 5-1 and 5-2 on your own using UAM equations? Try it


Homework Equations



This is the equation I need to end up at...

R=Vox/g(Voy+(Voy^+2gh)^1/2


The Attempt at a Solution



I am not really sure where to start. I was trying to use the equations for range and height but it does not seem to be getting me anywhere. This is my first physics course.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
welcome to pf!

hi jensgt! welcome to pf! :smile:

(try using the X2 button just above the Reply box :wink:)

don't try to memorise (or use) the range or height equations :wink:, go back to the standard constant acceleration equations, for the x and y directions (separately)

they'll use the same t …

show us what you get :smile:
 
The equations I know are

Vx = Vox + Axt

X = Xo + Voxt + 1/2axt^2

X-Xo = [(Vox + Vx)/2]t

Vx^2 = Vox^2 +2ax(X-Xo)

I am just confused as to where to start. I derived the other one he asked us about this one has me stuck.
 
hi jensgt! :smile:

(just got up :zzz:)
jensgt said:
I am just confused as to where to start.

use x = xo + Vxot + 1/2axt2

and y = yo + Vyot + 1/2ayt2

(obviously, ax = 0) …

show us what you get :smile:

(btw, never use "x" for times, it's too confusing … use "*" instead, or nothing at all! :wink:)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top