Cartesian to Polar Integral: Evaluate

  • Thread starter Thread starter chevy900ss
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cartesian Polar
chevy900ss
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Change the Cartesian integral into an equivalent polar integral. Then evaluate the polar integral.
int(-1to1)int((sqrt(1-y^2))to(sqrt(1-y))[x^2+y^2]dxdy

Homework Equations


x=rcostheta
y=rsintheta


The Attempt at a Solution


int(-1to1)int((sqrt1-(rsintheta)^2)to(sqrt(1-(rsintheta))))[(rcostheta)^2+(rsintheta)^2]rdrdtheta
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Note that [x^2+y^2] is simply r^2 (by definition!).

Also you cannot just change your integration boundaries like that. For example, neither theta nor r runs between -1 and 1.
I suggest drawing an image of the integration region, then think about how to describe it in terms of boundaries on r and theta.
 
ok so i am not sure how to get the new boundries
but its r^2rdrdtheta which integrated goes to r^4/4dtheta. Is this right?
 
Yes, \int r^3dr is r^4/4.

Are you sure about that "y= \sqrt{1- x} limit? That will give the right part of a parabola for y> 0 it is inside the unit circle given by the lower limit and for y< 0, it is outside.
 
i thought it was x=sqrt(1-y)
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top