Change in pressure and Internal Energy

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between changes in pressure, volume, and internal energy in thermodynamic processes. It confirms that for an isovolumetric process, the change in internal energy can be expressed as ΔU = 3/2 ΔP V. A specific example is provided where a pressure change from 200 Pa to 100 Pa at a constant volume of 6 m³ yields a change in internal energy of 900 J. The conversation also raises a question about scenarios where initial and final PV values are known, but ΔU cannot be directly calculated using ΔU = 3/2 ΔPV, suggesting that more complex methods may be necessary. Limitations of the equation for monatomic ideal gases are acknowledged, indicating the need for careful application in various contexts.
wongrufus
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I'm aware of the equation
ΔU = Q + W
ΔU is the change in internal energy which equals 3/2 nRΔT
Q is heat transfer
W is workdone

so PV = nRT
would it be correct to say that
ΔP V = nRΔT?

For isovolumetric process (i.e. no volume change, no work done),
can i say that
change in internal energy = 3/2 nRΔT = 3/2 ΔP V?

Say
Pressure changes from 200Pa --> 100Pa
Volume remains at 6 m^3
Would it be right to conclude that the change in internal energy = 3/2 x 100 x 6 = 900J?

**New Question: Is it possible (and if possible, under what condition) that the initial PV and final PV are known BUT the change in internal energy cannot be found directly by ΔU = 3/2 ΔPV?
coz i always come across questions where a P-V graph is given but the internal energy has to be calculated by more complicated methods,
i.e. ΔU = Q + W and not ΔU = 3/2 ΔPV

thx*c
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I believe that is correct for a monatomic ideal gas. 900 J of heat flows into the system, which raises the temperature, which increases the pressure, which accounts for the increase in internal energy by the relation ΔU=3/2 ΔP V as you say.
 
does the equation
ΔU = 3/2 nRΔT = 3/2 PΔV = 3/2 ΔPV
have its limitations?
 
Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'
Here are two fragments from Banach's monograph in Mechanics I have never seen the term <<velocity of transport>> in English texts. Actually I have never seen this term being named somehow in English. This term has a name in Russian books. I looked through the original Banach's text in Polish and there is a Polish name for this term. It is a little bit surprising that the Polish name differs from the Russian one and also differs from this English translation. My question is: Is there...
I know that mass does not affect the acceleration in a simple pendulum undergoing SHM, but how does the mass on the spring that makes up the elastic pendulum affect its acceleration? Certainly, there must be a change due to the displacement from equilibrium caused by each differing mass? I am talking about finding the acceleration at a specific time on each trial with different masses and comparing them. How would they compare and why?
Back
Top