I Changing the RPM of a frictionless spinning wheel in a box

AI Thread Summary
A frictionless spinning wheel in a vacuum box will continue to rotate at its initial RPM, as external movements of the box do not affect the wheel's rotation due to the conservation of angular momentum. The wheel's RPM remains unchanged as long as there is no friction or external forces acting on it. The discussion highlights that turning the handlebars of a bike while the front wheel is spinning does not alter the wheel's RPM in an ideal frictionless scenario. It is emphasized that the wheel must be perfectly balanced and rigid for this principle to hold true. Overall, the conservation of angular momentum is key to understanding the behavior of the spinning wheel.
SpaceThoughts
Messages
16
Reaction score
1
Imagine a spinning wheel built into a hand size vacuum box. There is no friction between the axe bearings of the wheel and the box. Let's say that the wheel rotates with 60 RPM. Am I right if I assume:

1. The wheel continues to rotate, approximately as if in space.
2. It is not possible to change the 60 RPM in any way, as long as the box and the content is not broken. No matter how we twist and turn the box from the outside.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How is the wheel axle attached to the interior of the box? How does gravity play in all of this?

Also, you can certainly design things to be able to add rotational energy to the spinning wheel, such as using a rotor from an electric motor as your spinning wheel...
 
Let me ask the same question in a less confusing way:

I lift the front wheel of my bike off the ground and make it spin. I turn the handlebars right-left-right-left.
I feel the resistance of moving the handlebar back and forth. The faster the wheel spins the more resistance.

Will turning the handlebar back and forth change the RPM of the bike wheel, or would the wheel continue to rotate with the same RPM if there were no friction?
From my experience I think the RPM would not change, but I have not found a clear answer to this question.
 
SpaceThoughts said:
Will turning the handlebar back and forth change the RPM of the bike wheel, or would the wheel continue to rotate with the same RPM if there were no friction?
For the ideal case with no axial friction and, say, a perfectly rigid wheel your experience is correct. To see this you could perhaps ask yourself what mechanical quantity usually is conserved in cases of no friction and see if this helps you conclude something. This will also explain why the wheel, in addition to the axis bearings, has to be idealized (i.e. have no internal friction).
 
One needs the assumption that the wheel is balanced.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top