Charge conjugation of Complex Klein Gordon Lagrangian

orentago
Messages
27
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Show that the complex Klein-Gordon Lagrangian density:

L=N\left(\partial_\alpha\phi^{\dagger}(x)\partial^\alpha\phi(x)-\mu^2\phi^{\dagger}(x)\phi(x)\right)

is invariant under charge conjugation:

\phi(x)\rightarrow C\phi(x)C^{-1}=\eta_c \phi^\dagger (x)

Where C is a unitary operator and \eta_c is a phase factor.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



The transformation can also be written as follows: \phi^\dagger (x) \rightarrow \eta_c^{-1} \phi(x)

Hence performing the transformations on \phi(x) and \phi^\dagger (x) gives:

N\left(\partial_\alpha(\eta_c^{-1}\phi(x))\partial^\alpha(\eta_c\phi^\dagger (x))-\mu^2(\eta_c^{-1}\phi(x))(\eta_c \phi^\dagger(x))\right)=N\left(\partial_\alpha\phi(x)\partial^\alpha \phi^\dagger (x)-\mu^2\phi(x) \phi^\dagger(x)\right)=N\left(\partial^\alpha\phi(x)\partial_\alpha \phi^\dagger (x)-\mu^2\phi(x) \phi^\dagger(x)\right)

Where the final step can be made fairly easily by raising and lowering indices. I'm a little unsure over my first assumption about how \phi^\dagger (x) transforms, but otherwise I'm fairly confident in the rest of my steps. Is this solution valid?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I have another question. It can be shown that C a(\mathbf{k})C^{-1}=\eta_c b(\mathbf{k}) and C b(\mathbf{k})C^{-1}=\eta_c^* a(\mathbf{k}).

I can show the first one fairly easily by just substituting the full expressions of the fields into the transformation condition above. I'm a little uncertain about the second one. I can't see how to derive it using the same method as the first one. My other idea was that it could be derived from the first expression, by multiplying both sides from the left by C^{-1} and from the right by C, to get rid of the operators around the a(\mathbf{k}), but then this wouldn't give the right expression on the RHS.

Any thoughts?
 
Last edited:
Does anyone have any ideas for the second question, or should I supply more information?
 
Actually no worries I've sorted it: applying charge conjugation twice takes one back to the original state. It's so simple I don't know why I didn't think of it!
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top