Charge on a glass bead derived from potential difference between 2 points

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the charge of a positively charged glass bead based on the potential difference between two points. The initial calculation yielded a charge of 4.2 x 10^-10 C, but confusion arose regarding the distances used. It was clarified that the distances mentioned in the problem refer to the edge of the bead, not its center, leading to a revised understanding of the distances as 3 mm and 5 mm from the center. The correct formula for potential difference was applied, leading to a recalculated charge of approximately 2.23 x 10^-10 C. This highlights the importance of accurately interpreting distance measurements in physics problems.
samdunhamss
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A 2.0 mm diameter glass bead is positively charged. The potential difference between a point 2.0 mm from the bead and a point 4.0 mm from the bead is 500V. What is the charge on the bead?


Actual Answer
4.2*10^-10

I am unable to understand or even get near this answer. Any help is greatly appreciated.


Homework Equations


V = Kq/r


The Attempt at a Solution



V = kq[1/r -1/r']

500 V = 9x10^9 (q) [1/.004-1/.006]

500/((9x10^9)(1/.004-1.006)) = q

q= 2.23x10^-10
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
'Just worked it out. It's kind of silly. When the problem says "a point x mm from the bead", it does not mean from the center of the bead. It means from the edge of the bead. So the two points in question are actually 3 mm and 5 mm from the bead's center.

[Edit] By the way, in your original attempt you were using the bead's diameter instead of its radius, to get the distance to the center.
 
Thank you, your help is appreciated.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top