Chemistry - Lewis Structure question

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the Lewis structure of H2CO (formaldehyde) and the placement of atoms according to the octet rule. Participants agree that while multiple Lewis structures can represent the molecule, the optimal representations are those that reflect the spatial arrangement of atoms, particularly the bond angles. The consensus is that the hydrogen atoms should be depicted as spread apart to minimize repulsion, although the actual bond angles are close to 120 degrees due to sp2 hybridization. Additionally, the discussion highlights that Lewis structures do not account for VSEPR theory, which is crucial for understanding molecular geometry.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Lewis structures and the octet rule
  • Basic knowledge of molecular geometry and VSEPR theory
  • Familiarity with hybridization concepts, specifically sp2 hybridization
  • Ability to interpret molecular models and bond angles
NEXT STEPS
  • Research VSEPR theory and its application to molecular shapes
  • Study sp2 hybridization and its effects on bond angles
  • Explore the concept of molecular polarity and charge distribution
  • Learn about the significance of resonance structures in chemistry
USEFUL FOR

Chemistry students, educators, and anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of molecular structures and bonding theories.

mystmyst
Messages
57
Reaction score
0
I understand the idea of the Lewis Structure and the octet rule. What I don't know is where to place the atoms. And unfortunately my book doesn't explain it. They just draw the lewis structur and expect us to understand how they did it.

For example: Draw the lewis structure of H_2CO

[PLAIN]http://img46.imageshack.us/img46/7392/lewisstructure.png

The book's answer is in black. Two other scenarios I drew in red and blue. Are my other scenarios incorrect? Does where you place the outer atoms really matter?

Can someone please help?
Thanks!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I would say all three are equivalent.

Edit: there is a slight problem with the molecule shape and bond angles, but if someone wants to be nitpicky about it, all three are wrong (including the one from the book). IMHO it is better to draw both hydrogen bonds on one line, to show that they are equivalent. In reality all three bond angles are close to 120 deg.
 
Last edited:
all the three are equivalent indeed!
 
All three are equivalent. Lewis structures are simple drawings, they don't take into account VSEPR theory.
 
They are all correct, but the left drawing and the center drawings are the best out of all three. They show that the hydrogen's are spread as far apart from each other as possible because both of those atoms are positively charged, so they repel each other.
 
Sniperman724 said:
hydrogen's are spread as far apart from each other as possible because both of those atoms are positively charged, so they repel each other.

No, they are not spread apart as far as possible, they are very close to the sp2 angle of 120°.

Note that your logic is incomplete. If they are positively charged, oxygen must be charged negatively - and its charge must be twice higher, as the molecule is neutral. That in turn means repulsion from oxygen is stronger than repulsion between hydrogens and in effect they are not spread apart, but a little bit closer than expected.

Not sure what the real angle is, but quick googling shows this page:

http://www.800mainstreet.com/formaldehyde/Formaldehyde-Bond-length.html
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
11K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K