Computing Neutron Source Strength - Your Advice Welcome

AI Thread Summary
To compute the neutron source strength of an Am-Be neutron source in neutrons per second, one can use the alpha decay rate of Am-241 along with the macroscopic cross-section and reaction efficiency. Amersham provides a typical output of approximately 2.2 x 10^6 neutrons per second per curie at manufacture, which requires correction for Am-241 decay. Knowledge of the original curie amount or the date of manufacture is essential for accurate calculations. Additionally, the Po-210/Be neutron source yields about 70 neutrons per million alpha particles, necessitating a conversion factor. Resources such as the "Handbook of Health Physics and Radiological Health" can provide further guidance on these calculations.
Stephan_doc
Messages
34
Reaction score
2
Greetings to all,
I know activity for a Am-Be neutron source. I want to compute strenght source in neutrons/s. Yours advices are welcome. Thank you!
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Stephan_doc said:
Greetings to all,
I know activity for a Am-Be neutron source. I want to compute strenght source in neutrons/s. Yours advices are welcome. Thank you!
One could take the α decay rate of Am-241, and with knowledge of the macroscopic cross-section, including reaction efficiency, determine the n source term.

Alternatively, Amersham produces an Am-Be source of ~ 2.2 x 106 n/sec per Ci. This is the approximate value at manufacture, so one has to correct for Am-241 decay. One would have to know the Ci of Am of the original source, or the date of manufacture.
 
Thank you for answer, finally i found the solution. For example Po-210/Be neutrons-source has a yield of 70 neutrons/1milion alpha particles.
 
You need a conversion factor. Look at

Bernard Shlein, L. A. (1998). Handbook of Health Physics and Radiological Health Third Edition. Baltimore: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins.

Stephan_doc said:
Greetings to all,
I know activity for a Am-Be neutron source. I want to compute strenght source in neutrons/s. Yours advices are welcome. Thank you!
 
Hello, I'm currently trying to compare theoretical results with an MCNP simulation. I'm using two discrete sets of data, intensity (probability) and linear attenuation coefficient, both functions of energy, to produce an attenuated energy spectrum after x-rays have passed through a thin layer of lead. I've been running through the calculations and I'm getting a higher average attenuated energy (~74 keV) than initial average energy (~33 keV). My guess is I'm doing something wrong somewhere...
Back
Top