Conceptual elevator and atwood pulley problem

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around an Atwood machine on an elevator with two masses, where mass m2 descends one meter in 5 seconds. Initial calculations suggested that the elevator was accelerating downward, but further analysis revealed it is actually accelerating upward. The confusion stems from the relationship between the normal force and perceived weight, which increases when the elevator accelerates upward. The net force acting on the system indicates that a higher gravitational force is experienced when the elevator accelerates up, leading to a greater downward acceleration for mass m2. Ultimately, the conclusion is that the elevator's upward acceleration results in a higher effective gravitational force acting on the masses.
runphysicsrun
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A simple Atwood machine composed of a single pulley and two masses, m1 and m2 is on an elevator. When m1= 44.7kg and m2=45.3kg, it takes 5.00s for mass m2 to descend exactly one meter from rest relative to the elevator. What is the elevator's motion? (That is, is it moving with constant velocity or accelerating up or down?

Homework Equations



\SigmaF=m*a
Y=y0 +v0t+1/2at2

The Attempt at a Solution


I found the \SigmaF on m2 \SigmaF on m1 and solved for a, which I took to be the acceleration of mass 2 when the pulley wasn't on the elevator (which I got to be -0.06) Then, I used the kinematic equation to calculate the actual acceleration of mass 2 (which I got to be -0.08 ) Comparing the two, I reasoned that mass 2 was accelerating faster downward on the elevator, which meant some downward force had been applied. Thus, I came to the conclusion that the elevator must have been accelerating downward. I was wrong. It's accelerating upward. Can anyone explain this to me?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
runphysicsrun said:

Homework Statement



A simple Atwood machine composed of a single pulley and two masses, m1 and m2 is on an elevator. When m1= 44.7kg and m2=45.3kg, it takes 5.00s for mass m2 to descend exactly one meter from rest relative to the elevator. What is the elevator's motion? (That is, is it moving with constant velocity or accelerating up or down?

Homework Equations



\SigmaF=m*a
Y=y0 +v0t+1/2at2

The Attempt at a Solution


I found the \SigmaF on m2 \SigmaF on m1 and solved for a, which I took to be the acceleration of mass 2 when the pulley wasn't on the elevator (which I got to be -0.06) Then, I used the kinematic equation to calculate the actual acceleration of mass 2 (which I got to be -0.08 ) Comparing the two, I reasoned that mass 2 was accelerating faster downward on the elevator, which meant some downward force had been applied. Thus, I came to the conclusion that the elevator must have been accelerating downward. I was wrong. It's accelerating upward. Can anyone explain this to me?


You correctly found the mass accelerated down at a greater rate than in a stationary lift.
The same thing would have happened in a stationary lift on a planet where gravity was a little stronger than here on Earth.
In a stronger gravity field, you would feel a little bit heavier.

OK. When do you feel heavier in a lift? When it is accelerating up? When it is accelerating down?
 
When it's accelerating up? Because sense of weight comes from Normal Force and the normal force is greater in a lift accelerating up. But I still don't get how this gives mass 2 a more negative accel?

When you're going up, if you feel heavier, mass 2 would be heavier as well. But wouldn't the whole pulley system be heavier? The acceleration is changing by the same amount for both objects. So, really I have no idea how to tell that the elevator is going up or down.
 
Last edited:
runphysicsrun said:
When it's accelerating up? Because sense of weight comes from Normal Force and the normal force is greater in a lift accelerating up. But I still don't get how this gives mass 2 a more negative accel?

You accurately calculated an acceleration of -0.06 using a g value of 9.8 for a stationary lift.

Try re-calculating with a g value of 10.8 and see what you get.
 
runphysicsrun said:
When you're going up, if you feel heavier, mass 2 would be heavier as well. But wouldn't the whole pulley system be heavier? The acceleration is changing by the same amount for both objects. So, really I have no idea how to tell that the elevator is going up or down.

The net force on the two mass system is m2.g - m1.g

so (m2 - m1).g

m2 - m1 doesn't change, so the only way to get a larger acceleration is to have a higher value of g - an environment in which your weight is higher.

One way to do that is put the masses in a lift that is accelerating up. You know the effective g is higher in there, as you are quite familiar with feeling heavier in such a lift.

EDIT: A pendulum even swings with a smaller period in a lift that is accelerating up, due to the artificially high g value.

EDIT 2: 1:00 am here, I am off to bed.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top