Confused about KCL & Nodal Analysis (basic stuff )

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the application of Kirchhoff's Current Law (KCL) in nodal analysis, specifically addressing the confusion surrounding current direction and equation setup. The user grapples with the concept that current can flow in any direction, as long as the conservation of charge is maintained, leading to the equation I_{in} = I_{out}. The correct approach involves defining currents consistently, either all entering or all leaving the node, without introducing unnecessary negatives. The discussion emphasizes that the direction of current can be defined arbitrarily, provided the mathematical relationships are correctly maintained.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Kirchhoff's Current Law (KCL)
  • Basic knowledge of nodal analysis in electrical circuits
  • Familiarity with Ohm's Law
  • Ability to interpret circuit diagrams
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of Kirchhoff's Voltage Law (KVL)
  • Learn how to derive nodal equations for complex circuits
  • Practice solving circuit problems using KCL and KVL
  • Explore circuit simulation tools like LTspice for visualizing current flow
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineering students, circuit designers, and anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of circuit analysis techniques, particularly in applying KCL and nodal analysis effectively.

Nat3
Messages
69
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I'm confused about how to use KCL when doing Nodal Analysis. Please consider the diagram below:

[PLAIN]http://img27.imageshack.us/img27/4900/20091019131641633915550.jpg

Homework Equations



My first point of confusion is that the diagram shows the current "4Ix" going up, but I thought current always went from higher voltage to lower voltage? (which would be down, in this case).

I also am very confused on how to setup the KCL equation, as you'll see in my attempt below..

The Attempt at a Solution



To use KCL, we assume that all of the currents are either entering or leaving the node and then add them up, right? Since one of the currents is already shown as entering, would it be logical to write my equation with them all entering? I tried to write the KCL equation like this:

[PLAIN]http://img651.imageshack.us/img651/6033/codecogseqn.gif

The first term is the current entering from the left, the second is term the current going up -- it's negative because it's entering through the negative sign (ohms law) -- and the third term is the current entering on the right, also negative for the same reason as before.

I know this is wrong, but I've spent hours trying to figure this out and am still totally confused. Please help me understand!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
you can define the direction of current any way you want. when you solve the unknown, you may find the current is negative, indicating the actual current is flowing in the opposite direction as your guess.

as for your nodal equations, they are almost right except for when you seemingly randomly throw in negatives with the odd reason of "ohms law"

I_{in} = I_{out}
this is because charge must be conserved. What flows into a node must flow out of the node.

It is a common standard to define current to leave toward any branch with a resistor in it and to define the current of a branch with a current source as the same direction as that source (after all, why not?)

so the nodal equation you seek to write out would have the foundation as such (in words, not numbers):
current entering the node from the current source = current leaving the node toward the 1 ohm resistor + current leaving the node toward the 5 ohm resistor

don't add any silly negatives! just stick with the math. Current approaches the positive terminal of a resistor. As an example, "current leaving the node toward the 1 ohm resistor" would be like this mathematically:
\frac{V_o - V_1}{1}

It's worth nothing, also, you could also define all the currents as entering the node for the branches with resistors. You will have V1 - V0 in the numerator for the same example resistor instead of v0 - v1. That would be the equivalency of subtracting the once labeled "in" current onto the "out" side. And when you distribute the subtraction through (v0 - v1) you get (v1 - v0), so it is mathematically the same. It all goes back to my original point: you can define the directions any way you want.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K